> I think the light speed has been slowed down,, the netrinios must be tire
> from traveling to fast?? let me know when it is available and I will
> purchase a copy
> Allan
>
Will do!!
As far as photons and light-speed go, well, if it is true (and it is!)
that space is expanding, then photon MUST accelerate through 5
dimensions in order to appear to move at a constant rate in 4-D space-
time. This is, naturally, covered in my book and forms the basis of
what I call 'Extra-Special Relativity'. ;-)
>
>
> On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 10:49 PM, Vam <atewari2...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Good luck, Pat ! I'm sure you have it from all others on this list
> > who've known you.
>
> > Whether you're held up, are sauntering or are hurtling through your
> > future... keep us posted.
>
> > On Nov 17, 8:22 pm, Pat <PatrickDHarring...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> > > On Nov 3, 10:00 pm, Allan H <allanh1...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > do I need to pre order your Pat? if that will help,,?? I am not a
> > great
> > > > traveler,, I create problems for my self but need to know things
> > like
> > > > housing cost and then things like transportation to and from airports
> > and
> > > > which air port... when it comes to traveling I really don't do much
> > now
> > > > you know why.
> > > > Alla n
>
> > > Completely understandable! At the moment, ordering isn't possible as
> > > we have still yet to confirm the retail price. Nonetheless, the
> > > website ishttp://newlimepublishing.com/. You'll be able to see the
> > > 'place' where the book will be, but, as yet, all that's there is the
> > > placeholder. Still, it's nice to see my name in lights, kinda,
> > > already.
> > > On another note, I've just sealed a deal to appear on Swindon 105.5
> > > radio on Monday, 19th Dec., 2011 at 10:00pm on Paul Devlin's show
> > > 'Outer Limits'. It's a show about the paranormal and, as my theory
> > > can put some science behind the concept of eternal consciousness, it's
> > > on-topic enough for Paul to be kind enough to have me on-air. It will
> > > be a 'Live' show, so, if anyone can tune in, please do. I DO believe
> > > that the show will be available to download from their website a few
> > > hours after it has aired, although I'm not positive of that. I'll
> > > check back with Paul and find out for sure and let you ALL know. Next
> > > trick is to coerce the BBC to put me on air. Wish me luck!! ;-)
>
> > > > On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 5:29 PM, Pat <PatrickDHarring...@hotmail.com>
> > wrote:
>
> > > > > On Oct 27, 3:25 pm, Allan H <allanh1...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > I normally.. buy my books though the ""Book Depository" in
> > England,, I
> > > > > like
> > > > > > their world wide free shipping.. either that I send you the money
> > you
> > > > > > sign it then send it to me..
>
> > > > > Once we've printed a few, I can do that. We're still on target for a
> > > > > release date on 21-Dec-2011, but I doubt it will be sooner.
> > Also--and
> > > > > this is, of course, for everyone--my publisher and I are thinking
> > > > > about whether or not to plan a 'launch' for the book. That is, a
> > > > > public party to celebrate the publication. The 'hitch', though, is
> > > > > that, before we plan it, we need to have enough people to make it
> > > > > worthwhile. You are ALL, of course, invited and it would be held,
> > > > > most likely, in Stratford-upon-Avon. I don't have a date, yet, for
> > > > > it; but, if, as I said, we have enough of a response to interest in
> > > > > attending, we'll plan it. And, I suspect we would try to plan it for
> > > > > a date when MOST people could attend. Please, let me know what you
> > > > > (all) think!!
>
> > > > > > It is true it repeats itself regularly.. CERN is not looking for
> > a red
> > > > > > face..
>
> > > > > But are they looking around dimensional corners? I suspect not.
> > This
> > > > > 'revelation', of course, doesn't completely throw out the old
> > > > > textbooks like so many think. It has NO bearing on Einstein's energy
> > > > > equation, E=MC^2, for example. It only means that C is NOT the speed
> > > > > limit we thought is was and, of course, it implies that tachyons are,
> > > > > most likely, well...more likely. The existence of tachyons is
> > > > > predicted by the original 26-dimensional String Theory and THAT is
> > the
> > > > > basis for MY work, so, I'm not at all displeased with evidence that
> > > > > points towards tachyon-like particles. If anything, it's another
> > > > > feather in my cap. LOL!!
>
> > > > > > I do not see them rushing to build a second CERN they are a little
> > > > > beyond
> > > > > > my pocket change at the moment (see me in 500 year then we will
> > talk
> > > > > about
> > > > > > it)
>
> > > > > In 500 years, there may well be a new universe and intelligent life
> > > > > (allowing for a rapid evolution via a large Hubble Constant--you
> > know,
> > > > > a 6-day Creation!!) would still be fairly nascent regarding particle
> > > > > physics. But, you might be the engineer behind the New
> > > > > Stonehenge!! ;-)
>
> > > > > > On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 4:23 PM, Pat <
> > PatrickDHarring...@hotmail.com>
> > > > > wrote:
>
> > > > > > > On Oct 13, 7:21 pm, Allan H <allanh1...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > okay Pat to quote you: Scientists are a stubborn bunch and see
> > that
> > > > > which
> > > > > > > > they WANT to see.
>
> > > > > > > > That is true,, except it is strange that on random timed
> > tests the
> > > > > same
> > > > > > > > event occurs and they are checking for neutrinos else where
> > > > > looking to
> > > > > > > > eliminate the random event .. what they are saying is "a
> > particle is
> > > > > > > > arriving before it should.".. that it,, but that is very
> > > > > interesting..
>
> > > > > > > > what it is time will tell
> > > > > > > > Allan
>
> > > > > > > Again, I agree. Time will tell and the experiment and potential
> > > > > > > result were interesting. It just needs to be repeated
> > regularly, now,
> > > > > > > using different (but similar) equipment and between different
> > > > > > > locations. It still could end up only implying that the
> > neutrinos are
> > > > > > > discovering ways to exploit extra-dimensional short-cuts rather
> > than
> > > > > > > actually moving faster-than-light.
>
> > > > > > > BTW, everyone, I'm still on target for a 21-Dec-2011 release
> > date for
> > > > > > > my book; however, the publisher has, now, changed the name of the
> > > > > > > publishing company and it will be published by 'New Lime
> > Publishing'.
> > > > > > > I'll get you (plural) the website as soon as it's up and
> > running. I
> > > > > > > promise that New Lime will get you your copies as quickly as
> > Amazon
> > > > > > > would; but, with a VERY key difference: when we see any of your
> > names
> > > > > > > on the order forms, you can rest assured that your copies will be
> > > > > > > signed by the author (that's me!) with a unique message for each
> > of
> > > > > > > you!!!! Through Amazon, that kind of 'order scrutiny' would be
> > > > > > > impossible.
>
> > > > > > > > On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 5:11 PM, Pat <
> > PatrickDHarring...@hotmail.com
>
> > > > > > > wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > > On Oct 7, 7:45 pm, Allan H <allanh1...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > I don't think they know for sure just what they know for
> > sure
> > > > > just
> > > > > > > what
> > > > > > > > > they
> > > > > > > > > > are something is arriving before the speed of light sez it
> > > > > should.
>
> > > > > > > > > > I think that is cool
> > > > > > > > > > Allan
>
> > > > > > > > > I think it's interesting, but they still can't rule out the
> > fact
> > > > > that
> > > > > > > > > the neutrinos that arrived 'early' MAY have not come from
> > CERN.
> > > > > Every
> > > > > > > > > star emits neutrinos in all directions at any time and as it
> > is
> > > > > very
> > > > > > > > > difficult to stop neutrinos, they pass through most
> > > > > > > > > everything...including the Earth. The fact that Gran Sasso
> > had
> > > > > > > > > created an object that WOULD stop neutrinos guarantees that,
> > at
> > > > > some
> > > > > > > > > point in time, it would do just that. They'll never be able
> > to
> > > > > rule
> > > > > > > > > out the possibility that the 'early' neutrinos may have been
> > > > > sourced
> > > > > > > > > from some place other than CERN and that will always cause
> > doubt.
> > > > > If
> > > > > > > > > the scientists don't accept that, then they are as idiotic
> > as the
> > > > > > > > > Church was when it demanded that the Sun revolve around the
> > Earth.
> > > > > > > > > Scientists are a stubborn bunch and see that which they WANT
> > to
> > > > > see.
> > > > > > > > > If they discover that neutrinos can consistently arrive at
> > their
> > > > > > > > > destination faster than the speed of light, it may not upset
> > > > > Special
> > > > > > > > > Relativity at all, rather, it may provide evidence that the
> > > > > neutrinos
> > > > > > > > > are taking a short cut via a different dimension. If so,
> > then it
> > > > > > > > > points towards a String Theory-based universe. As I
> > said...we'll
> > > > > > > > > see. I'm still publishing based on Special Relativity and
> > my book
> > > > > > > > > explains what I've said above regarding other potential
> > sources for
> > > > > > > > > the neutrinos. This result begs more questions than it
> > answers and
> > > > > > > > > THAT little fact only helps me with regard to String Theory.
> > ;-)
>
> > > > > > > > > > On Oct 7, 2011 8:39 PM, "archytas" <nwte...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > > > > I'd guess they do know the origin as Cern - but they
> > ain't sure
> > > > > > > they
> > > > > > > > > > > are neutrinos.
>
> > > > > > > > > > > On Oct 7, 2:58 pm, Allan H <allanh1...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > Pat it was not a one time affair,, checked and
> > rechecked..
> > > > > > > > > > > > it will be changing or rather challenging the concepts
> > > > > > > > > > > > Allan
>
> > > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 3:25 PM, Pat <
> > > > > > > PatrickDHarring...@hotmail.com>
> > > > > > > > > > > wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > On Oct 4, 1:47 pm, Allan H <allanh1...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > I do not think time travel is putting it correctly.
> > > > > what I
> > > > > > > think
> > > > > > > > > > > they
> > > > > > > > > > > > > are
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > really saying is that there are laws beyond those
> > that we
> > > > > > > know
> > > > > > > > > and
>
> ...
>
> read more »- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
0 comments:
Post a Comment