> Good luck, Pat ! I'm sure you have it from all others on this list
> who've known you.
>
> Whether you're held up, are sauntering or are hurtling through your
> future... keep us posted.
>
I'll try! Today's bit of news is that the RRP has been set: £19.99.
So, it's off to the printer's now. Oh, and, of course, there's been
another change in the cover design. Now, I'ts going to have a
chalkboard on it with wording as follows:
-----------------------------------
And God said,
"( (E=MC^2) and (E=Fh) )--> ( (M<-->F) --> (h/C^2) )"
And there was light!
-----------------------------------
Hopefully, the combination of scripture and equations will get the
message across, as well as hit the funny bone.
In a couple of weeks, once I have a copy available, the local
newspaper, The Banbury Guardian, will, most likely, run a story about
it. They'd run it now, but they want a picture of me WITH the book in
order to get the best publicity out of it. They're angle will be
that, not only does the book bring science and religion together but
also explains 'dark energy' and 'the arrow of time', which are ground-
breaking.
> On Nov 17, 8:22 pm, Pat <PatrickDHarring...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Nov 3, 10:00 pm, Allan H <allanh1...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > do I need to pre order your Pat? if that will help,,?? I am not a great
> > > traveler,, I create problems for my self but need to know things like
> > > housing cost and then things like transportation to and from airports and
> > > which air port... when it comes to traveling I really don't do much now
> > > you know why.
> > > Alla n
>
> > Completely understandable! At the moment, ordering isn't possible as
> > we have still yet to confirm the retail price. Nonetheless, the
> > website ishttp://newlimepublishing.com/. You'll be able to see the
> > 'place' where the book will be, but, as yet, all that's there is the
> > placeholder. Still, it's nice to see my name in lights, kinda,
> > already.
> > On another note, I've just sealed a deal to appear on Swindon 105.5
> > radio on Monday, 19th Dec., 2011 at 10:00pm on Paul Devlin's show
> > 'Outer Limits'. It's a show about the paranormal and, as my theory
> > can put some science behind the concept of eternal consciousness, it's
> > on-topic enough for Paul to be kind enough to have me on-air. It will
> > be a 'Live' show, so, if anyone can tune in, please do. I DO believe
> > that the show will be available to download from their website a few
> > hours after it has aired, although I'm not positive of that. I'll
> > check back with Paul and find out for sure and let you ALL know. Next
> > trick is to coerce the BBC to put me on air. Wish me luck!! ;-)
>
> > > On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 5:29 PM, Pat <PatrickDHarring...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > On Oct 27, 3:25 pm, Allan H <allanh1...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > I normally.. buy my books though the ""Book Depository" in England,, I
> > > > like
> > > > > their world wide free shipping.. either that I send you the money you
> > > > > sign it then send it to me..
>
> > > > Once we've printed a few, I can do that. We're still on target for a
> > > > release date on 21-Dec-2011, but I doubt it will be sooner. Also--and
> > > > this is, of course, for everyone--my publisher and I are thinking
> > > > about whether or not to plan a 'launch' for the book. That is, a
> > > > public party to celebrate the publication. The 'hitch', though, is
> > > > that, before we plan it, we need to have enough people to make it
> > > > worthwhile. You are ALL, of course, invited and it would be held,
> > > > most likely, in Stratford-upon-Avon. I don't have a date, yet, for
> > > > it; but, if, as I said, we have enough of a response to interest in
> > > > attending, we'll plan it. And, I suspect we would try to plan it for
> > > > a date when MOST people could attend. Please, let me know what you
> > > > (all) think!!
>
> > > > > It is true it repeats itself regularly.. CERN is not looking for a red
> > > > > face..
>
> > > > But are they looking around dimensional corners? I suspect not. This
> > > > 'revelation', of course, doesn't completely throw out the old
> > > > textbooks like so many think. It has NO bearing on Einstein's energy
> > > > equation, E=MC^2, for example. It only means that C is NOT the speed
> > > > limit we thought is was and, of course, it implies that tachyons are,
> > > > most likely, well...more likely. The existence of tachyons is
> > > > predicted by the original 26-dimensional String Theory and THAT is the
> > > > basis for MY work, so, I'm not at all displeased with evidence that
> > > > points towards tachyon-like particles. If anything, it's another
> > > > feather in my cap. LOL!!
>
> > > > > I do not see them rushing to build a second CERN they are a little
> > > > beyond
> > > > > my pocket change at the moment (see me in 500 year then we will talk
> > > > about
> > > > > it)
>
> > > > In 500 years, there may well be a new universe and intelligent life
> > > > (allowing for a rapid evolution via a large Hubble Constant--you know,
> > > > a 6-day Creation!!) would still be fairly nascent regarding particle
> > > > physics. But, you might be the engineer behind the New
> > > > Stonehenge!! ;-)
>
> > > > > On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 4:23 PM, Pat <PatrickDHarring...@hotmail.com>
> > > > wrote:
>
> > > > > > On Oct 13, 7:21 pm, Allan H <allanh1...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > okay Pat to quote you: Scientists are a stubborn bunch and see that
> > > > which
> > > > > > > they WANT to see.
>
> > > > > > > That is true,, except it is strange that on random timed tests the
> > > > same
> > > > > > > event occurs and they are checking for neutrinos else where
> > > > looking to
> > > > > > > eliminate the random event .. what they are saying is "a particle is
> > > > > > > arriving before it should.".. that it,, but that is very
> > > > interesting..
>
> > > > > > > what it is time will tell
> > > > > > > Allan
>
> > > > > > Again, I agree. Time will tell and the experiment and potential
> > > > > > result were interesting. It just needs to be repeated regularly, now,
> > > > > > using different (but similar) equipment and between different
> > > > > > locations. It still could end up only implying that the neutrinos are
> > > > > > discovering ways to exploit extra-dimensional short-cuts rather than
> > > > > > actually moving faster-than-light.
>
> > > > > > BTW, everyone, I'm still on target for a 21-Dec-2011 release date for
> > > > > > my book; however, the publisher has, now, changed the name of the
> > > > > > publishing company and it will be published by 'New Lime Publishing'.
> > > > > > I'll get you (plural) the website as soon as it's up and running. I
> > > > > > promise that New Lime will get you your copies as quickly as Amazon
> > > > > > would; but, with a VERY key difference: when we see any of your names
> > > > > > on the order forms, you can rest assured that your copies will be
> > > > > > signed by the author (that's me!) with a unique message for each of
> > > > > > you!!!! Through Amazon, that kind of 'order scrutiny' would be
> > > > > > impossible.
>
> > > > > > > On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 5:11 PM, Pat <PatrickDHarring...@hotmail.com
>
> > > > > > wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > On Oct 7, 7:45 pm, Allan H <allanh1...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > I don't think they know for sure just what they know for sure
> > > > just
> > > > > > what
> > > > > > > > they
> > > > > > > > > are something is arriving before the speed of light sez it
> > > > should.
>
> > > > > > > > > I think that is cool
> > > > > > > > > Allan
>
> > > > > > > > I think it's interesting, but they still can't rule out the fact
> > > > that
> > > > > > > > the neutrinos that arrived 'early' MAY have not come from CERN.
> > > > Every
> > > > > > > > star emits neutrinos in all directions at any time and as it is
> > > > very
> > > > > > > > difficult to stop neutrinos, they pass through most
> > > > > > > > everything...including the Earth. The fact that Gran Sasso had
> > > > > > > > created an object that WOULD stop neutrinos guarantees that, at
> > > > some
> > > > > > > > point in time, it would do just that. They'll never be able to
> > > > rule
> > > > > > > > out the possibility that the 'early' neutrinos may have been
> > > > sourced
> > > > > > > > from some place other than CERN and that will always cause doubt.
> > > > If
> > > > > > > > the scientists don't accept that, then they are as idiotic as the
> > > > > > > > Church was when it demanded that the Sun revolve around the Earth.
> > > > > > > > Scientists are a stubborn bunch and see that which they WANT to
> > > > see.
> > > > > > > > If they discover that neutrinos can consistently arrive at their
> > > > > > > > destination faster than the speed of light, it may not upset
> > > > Special
> > > > > > > > Relativity at all, rather, it may provide evidence that the
> > > > neutrinos
> > > > > > > > are taking a short cut via a different dimension. If so, then it
> > > > > > > > points towards a String Theory-based universe. As I said...we'll
> > > > > > > > see. I'm still publishing based on Special Relativity and my book
> > > > > > > > explains what I've said above regarding other potential sources for
> > > > > > > > the neutrinos. This result begs more questions than it answers and
> > > > > > > > THAT little fact only helps me with regard to String Theory. ;-)
>
> > > > > > > > > On Oct 7, 2011 8:39 PM, "archytas" <nwte...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > > > I'd guess they do know the origin as Cern - but they ain't sure
> > > > > > they
> > > > > > > > > > are neutrinos.
>
> > > > > > > > > > On Oct 7, 2:58 pm, Allan H <allanh1...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > Pat it was not a one time affair,, checked and rechecked..
> > > > > > > > > > > it will be changing or rather challenging the concepts
> > > > > > > > > > > Allan
>
> > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 3:25 PM, Pat <
> > > > > > PatrickDHarring...@hotmail.com>
> > > > > > > > > > wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > > > > > On Oct 4, 1:47 pm, Allan H <allanh1...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > I do not think time travel is putting it correctly.
> > > > what I
> > > > > > think
> > > > > > > > > > they
> > > > > > > > > > > > are
> > > > > > > > > > > > > really saying is that there are laws beyond those that we
> > > > > > know
> > > > > > > > and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > understand today,, they went to extreme measures to
> > > > verify
> > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > measurements Like actually measure the speed of light to
> > > > > > with in
> > > > > > > > 18
> > > > > > > > > > cm
> > > > > > > > > > > > to
> > > > > > > > > > > > > make sure the calculations were correct. like stopping
> > > > the
> > > > > > > > traffic
> > > > > > > > > > > > though
> > > > > > > > > > > > > the trans alps tunnel so it would not interfere
>
> ...
>
> read more »- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
0 comments:
Post a Comment