applications but there have been terrible goofs, as well, plus lack of
understanding and poor stewardship of the planet. I really don't agree
that man can conquer Mother Nature to his own needs or whims- look at
dams and the redirecting of rivers, instance, or the wearing-out of
agricultural lands or the dumping of waste and contamination. I am
wondering if all these wind turbines are causing the problems in
Texas- heat + fires as they alter the pattern of wind...and wave the
rain clouds away, alas. Somalia is mostly a political catastrophe and
charity will not alter its climate or poor land- in fact, the long
term damage to those starving children may have already happened
though their lives may be saved. What lives?
On Jul 31, 3:13 am, paradox <eadohe...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> Lol. Not if the science of longevity has anything to do with it :)
>
> Dont be pessimistic, rigsy; nature does it's thing, as does man; but
> it takes the capacity and the will of man to fix.
>
> On Jul 31, 8:38 am, rigsy03 <rigs...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > When Nature is to blame vs rotten governments/economics? I read the
> > population of Africa will rise 49% by 2050 and world population will
> > be 9 billion. I'll be dead. :-)
>
> > On Jul 30, 7:43 am, paradox <eadohe...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > Listening to some tv coverage of the humanitarian disaster (yet again)
> > > unfolding in the Horn of Africa, i learnt from a knowledgeable
> > > commentator that in order to respond appropriately, global aid and
> > > humanitarian quasi-governmental organisations actually have to
> > > classify a disaster by a fatality ratio; which got me thinking. When
> > > is a natural disaster a natural disaster?- Hide quoted text -
>
> > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
0 comments:
Post a Comment