On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 1:02 PM, leerevdouglas@googlemail.com <lee@rdfmedia.com> wrote:
Rise back to Godstate?
That is not my belife Gabs, rather shed ourselves of the illusion that
we are seperated from God. As I often say God is immenent throughout
the creation, there exist not one iota of matter that is not imbued
with the spirit of God.
> On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 1:06 PM, leerevdoug...@googlemail.com <
On May 26, 6:31 pm, gabbydott <gabbyd...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Same idea differant words.
>
> Hahaha, that's exactly the trick. That's when God falls to become Lucifer.
> It's the finding that they are telling you you need to do in order to rise
> back to Godstate. This is not what I understand RP says.
>
> >> - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text ->
>
>
> l...@rdfmedia.com> wrote:
> > As I say I fail to see the differance between putting this way, or
> > RP's way or my way. Same idea differant words.
>
> > RP says that God is imminent but this does not mean that I am God, and
> > I agree with him, but I'm sure he'll agree that without finding God
> > within, you stand no chance in finding God without.
>
> > It is a bold statement, but I honestly do try to see God in all
> > things, yep me included, and you too.
>
> > Haha but of course it is hard to find God in some people.
>
> > On May 26, 10:46 am, the taoist shaman <bryan...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> lee , o.r. , i think iknow what r.p. is getting at , forget the
> >> ocean , think of the stars , many different stars ( white red blue
> >> giant dwarf ect ) even the similar stars are different from each
> >> other , but they are part of the same whole , the galaxy , and though
> >> each galaxy is similar , and yet different , they are part of the same
> >> whole , the universe ....... if i were a glass of water id be a square
> >> glass with dull edges , ha ... ha .... :[
>
> >> leerevdoug...@googlemail.com wrote:
> >> > I fail to see the differance?
>
> >> > On May 26, 7:59 am, RP Singh <123...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> > > Instead of considering ourselves to be parts of the Whole , it would
> >> > > be better in my opinion to consider ourselves differing images of the
> >> > > Absolute in vessels of differing make and shape. Water in many
> vessels
> >> > > of differing sizes and shapes in a ocean is the same , but it is not
> a
> >> > > part of the ocean --it is actually the ocean. The illusion is the
> >> > > vessel and not the water.
>
> >> > > On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 10:53 AM, ornamentalmind
>
> >> > > <ornsmindseyes...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >> > > > While I greatly appreciate emanationism on many levels, to ignore
> the
> >> > > > consubstantial aspect of 'the many' simply ignores the experience
> of
> >> > > > many humans. We have the ability to think and by thinking break
> down
> >> > > > 'the one' into its component parts (as a thought, not an
> actuality).
>
> >> > > >http://www.iep.utm.edu/emanatio/
>
> >> > > > On May 25, 8:50 pm, RP Singh <123...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> > > >> If we think that we are part of the " Whole " we are sort of
> dividing
> >> > > >> up God. He then is no longer an entity but a composite of parts.
> The
> >> > > >> truth is that we are not parts but emanations which make His
> existence
> >> > > >> identifiable to our understanding.
> >> > > >> The reflection of the sun is a proof of the sun ;similarly the
> world
> >> > > >> is a proof of the Self.
>
> >> > > >> On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 8:17 AM, Ash <ashkas...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> > > >> > "Our consciousness makes us think that we are special , far
> removed from
> >> > > >> > matter , but in reality we are mortal and it is the One Spirit
> in all that
> >> > > >> > is immortal. "
> >> > > >> > I don't think that this must necessarily be the whole truth.
> What if one
> >> > > >> > sees that all things are a part of the whole, that is the world
> and/or
> >> > > >> > nature's way, and we perceive diverse phenomena by our natures
> inextricably?
>
> >> > > >> > I find it interesting that you would say the reflection of the
> sun in a
> >> > > >> > puddle is not the sun, what else is the sun but the forces of
> nature which
> >> > > >> > are the same as in the puddle? Our focus may be pointed at a
> less brilliant
> >> > > >> > and direct portion in comparison to the sun but it is shining
> through
> >> > > >> > nonetheless in everything if you know how or where to look.
>
> >> > > >> > On 5/19/2011 10:04 AM, RP Singh wrote:
>
> >> > > >> >> It is not a matter of perspective but the very nature of
> things. The
> >> > > >> >> world is dualistic by nature and God is Non-Dual.The world
> changes
> >> > > >> >> over time and is never in a constant state , whereas God
> remains the
> >> > > >> >> same always and is unborn , primeaval and indestructible--the
> same
> >> > > >> >> cannot be said of the world. It is so easy to say that I am the
> One ,
> >> > > >> >> but when a needle pricks you you grimace , how can you be the "
> One "
> >> > > >> >> when you feel pleasure and pain , happy and depressed. Our
> >> > > >> >> consciousness makes us think that we are special , far removed
> from
> >> > > >> >> matter , but in reality we are mortal and it is the One Spirit
> in all
> >> > > >> >> that is immortal.
>
> >> > > >> >> On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 4:39 PM, Molly<mollyb...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> >> > > >> >>> How is it possible, from a non dual perspective, to perceive
> the world
> >> > > >> >>> as dualistic in nature, and thus an illusion (and separate
> from
> >> > > >> >>> self)? By definition, this view would remain dualistic. I do
> think it
> >> > > >> >>> true that how we view the world forms our experience. From a
> >> > > >> >>> dualistic view, some are right, some are wrong. From a non
> dual view,
> >> > > >> >>> all views are the One/many paradox that is One. How we view
> (and
> >> > > >> >>> experience) birth and death changes as we change. From a non
> dual
> >> > > >> >>> perspective, they are only states of transformation and not a
> >> > > >> >>> beginning or end.
>
> >> > > >> >>> On May 17, 2:07 pm, RP Singh<123...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >> > > >> >>>> In duality there is the relationship of the observer and the
> observed
> >> > > >> >>>> , the knower and the known , that is , there are two. In
> Non-Duality
> >> > > >> >>>> there is only One and the world which is dualistic in nature
> , remains
> >> > > >> >>>> what it is , just an illusion - i.e. subject to birth and
> death. God
> >> > > >> >>>> ,Reality or Atman is Non-Dual and duality is just its
>
> expression.- Hide quoted text -
>
>
>
>
>
> >> > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
>
> - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
0 comments:
Post a Comment