Re: [Mind's Eye] Re: Just a thought...

Would you shed a little light on " collective mind ".

On Mon, May 2, 2011 at 7:36 PM, DarkwaterBlight
<douglas.blight@gmail.com> wrote:
> This take appeals to my understanding. Perpetually changing, evolving
> and reforming. Input has an outcome and causes an expanded "mind
> space", if you will. Is logic all logical and what is to be said about
> rationalizing the "irrational"? Should my thinking be correct by the
> standards of others or to my own? What of "raising the bar" in
> consciousness and of a paradigm shift to a more correct thinking of
> our "collective mind" ? Of all that goes into into thought and mind is
> this not the desired effect?
>
> On Apr 30, 9:23 am, "pol.science kid" <r.freeb...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> might thought be colored by the mind that engages it ....what is the realm
>> of pure thought that you mention here .... is it logic and
>> rationalisation...do you mean the method of employing that thought...because
>> ....knowing...percieving something for the first time the mind will
>> automatically fall back on the things it thinks it does know....
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 11:22 AM, Chad Moore <nis...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >  Knowledge unites, in being or in identity. Thinking separates, in
>> > subject-object relationship.
>> > Knowing has no place in the ordinary thought process. Thinking about
>> > something
>> > which has to be known is wrong, since it moves in a vicious circle. You
>> > cannot think
>> > of anything you have not known. Such thinking can never take you to the
>> > Truth.
>> > But when you direct your thought to something (say yourself) which you have
>> > otherwise
>> > visualized, the thought loses its own characteristics and limits, and
>> > stands
>> > revealed as that Self (Consciousness) itself. Thought is thus reduced into
>> > its essence.
>>
>> --
>> \--/ Peace- Hide quoted text -
>>
>> - Show quoted text -