My specialism was biochemistry - there are 100 specialisms in that now. The language games are so esoteric one is quickly lost. I've been into something called the 'biology of noise' of late, which gets so micro it beggars belief.
On Saturday, 9 February 2019 09:28:19 UTC, Vam wrote:
-- On Saturday, 9 February 2019 09:28:19 UTC, Vam wrote:
Natural science used to be a more inclusive, and to my mind more preferred, term for science. That was before men began to know more and more about less and less. I want specialisations and like specialists. But I prefer scientists who would hold the synthesised view out of his observations. Darwin's was absolutely exceptional. His work could be incorrect on several counts but it includes within its ambit the man making the observation.
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups ""Minds Eye"" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to minds-eye+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
0 comments:
Post a Comment