Re: Mind's Eye Re: secure network

My alter ego must be slipping Neil, I am ethically predisposed against
presenting a know-anything persona. Andrew sounds in the know regarding
PGP and web of trust in bitcoin, too bad SSL notaries fell through as an
experimental distribution model, I've been tracking Google from before
2008. Yes it 'could' be heavily used to bypass user privacy controls, I
would trust them about as far as I can throw 'em if I had a reason not
to but who the hell am I? The next McCarthy admin will doubtless have us
eating those words. :p Privacy is about resources, swim in the baseline
traffic flow and spout just enough random nonsense. Us cowboys are crazy
as a minute-an silo with a default password! Be afraid, world... *chuckles

The hibernating urge has been hard to shake this winter. It took all day
to get my office up to 60. But- I've used about 20-30lbs of propane this
year, so my carefully staged combination of fan, heater and cracked door
is a success. Running the gas hose through the door is kindof a minimal
insurance policy, I think I'll cancel my plan to run a conduit.

On 2/26/2014 5:24 PM, archytas wrote:
> I've been in favour of a move for a long time. Like Allan I could
> probably find something to break after a coach party of bulls had been
> through the china shop, but I don't like the format here now. Google
> NL only harass Allan because he is the last person between me and
> world domination through my instant messaging and VOIP service 'Free
> Until I've Got You All By The Shorties' - currently run by a teenage
> stooge under a pseudonym. Google NL is merely a Russian doll in the
> shell company for later tax dodging and to receive royalties from the
> range of coffee shops we will open later in the strategy.
>
> Ash sounds as though he knows something. I fancy something with a
> rather more international newspaper feel. Someone else would have to
> twerk the tech. I lack the right acronyms.
>
> On Monday, 24 February 2014 00:42:36 UTC, Ash wrote:
>
> What do you mean by secure? This can mean so many different
> things, in
> one case just having the ability to have side discussions could be
> accomplished on another service as Molly mentions Zurker but there
> are
> others like IRC that have chat history, though someone would have to
> figure out threading..(I like punBB's lightweight forum interface),
> email is really universal IMO. I have considered a number of
> improvements to google groups, but mostly as addon features for
> research
> and knowledge referencing. Is it the tech security, or policies
> Allan?
>
>
> On 2/10/2014 11:44 PM, Allan H wrote:
> > No Molly I really don't have a problem with Google, their size does
> > not really bother me and like you I am sure I am very boring. I do
> > have a problem with Google NL. I have had them come into my android
> > systems alter my preferences, downgrade my android system causing
> > other programs to malfunction.
> > Thanks to our friend Vam I joined Zurker social network .. they
> have
> > created the ability to create a secure network within Zurker
> where we
> > can have control. Just a thought, I know it has been brought up
> before
> > and I remember Chris trying to move minds eye
> >
> > ( Matrix ~~ Soul rules Body
> > ) ~~ Do No Harm
> > [_D ~ Allan H
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Molly <moll...@gmail.com <javascript:>>
> > To: mind...@googlegroups.com <javascript:>
> > Sent: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 12:25 AM
> > Subject: Mind's Eye Re: secure network
> >
> > I remember Chris' attempt to move the group to a different
> platform.
> > Do you have specific problems with google, or just an overall, too
> > big, too much info collected objection. Personally, anyone
> collecting
> > and paying attention to info on me is bored. I really don't
> care what
> > info is known, my life is not effected by it.
> >
> > On Monday, February 10, 2014 9:55:42 AM UTC-5, Allan Heretic wrote:
> >
> > I am wondering about the thought of opening "Minds Eye" on a
> > privately secure network away from google's control?
> >
> > --
> > (
> > )
> > |_D Allan
> >
> > Life is for moral, ethical and truthful living.
> >
> > Of course I talk to myself,
> > Sometimes I need expert advice..
> >
> > --
> >
> > ---
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> > Groups ""Minds Eye"" group.
> > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from
> it, send
> > an email to minds-eye+...@googlegroups.com <javascript:>.
> > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out
> <https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out>.
> > --
> >
> > ---
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> > Groups ""Minds Eye"" group.
> > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from
> it, send
> > an email to minds-eye+...@googlegroups.com <javascript:>.
> > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out
> <https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out>.
>
> --
>
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups ""Minds Eye"" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
> an email to minds-eye+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

--

---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups ""Minds Eye"" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to minds-eye+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.