Hard to say; they're certainly a force to be reckoned with.
On Sun, Dec 30, 2012 at 8:32 PM, archytas <nwterry@gmail.com> wrote:
New members would be good Chris - but could the cyber-world survive if
Gabby and her sister got together in the same space?
On 31 Dec, 00:51, Chris Jenkins <digitalprecip...@gmail.com> wrote:
> *laughing* No, not what I meant at all, but then, you knew that. ;)
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Sun, Dec 30, 2012 at 7:43 PM, gabbydott <gabbyd...@gmail.com> wrote:> > 2012/12/31 Chris Jenkins <digitalprecip...@gmail.com>
> > You mean, use the G+ community as an advertising channel? Good idea. Would
> > you want to write the promo texts? Anyone?
>
>
> >> As with Gravity, it would provide a path for additional conversations,
> >> and a path for new members to find their way here. But, if it's not
> >> something that anyone wants, don't bother. :D
>
> >> On Sun, Dec 30, 2012 at 7:18 PM, gabbydott <gabbyd...@gmail.com> wrote:> >>> 2012/12/30 Chris Jenkins <digitalprecip...@gmail.com>
>
> >>> Hi Chris, as I said, I reserved the name space, that's all. The
> >>> community thing is still going on here. No one seems interested in moving
> >>> and Google still allows to use the groups functionality, which is much
> >>> better suited for our purpose of discussing things. Or do we miss
> >>> something? Except you, of course. ;)
>
>> >>>> On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 12:46 PM, gabbydott <gabbyd...@gmail.com>wrote:
> >>>> Gabs, what's the link to your community on G+?
>
>
> >>>>> Google+ Communities <http://www.google.com/+/learnmore/communities/>are out now.
>--
> >>>>> I've had a quick look around and wanted to inform you that I blocked
> >>>>> the community name "Minds Eye". I thought it might be useful if one day we
> >>>>> decide to move there - or, if we are made to move there. I doubt that
> >>>>> anyone of you would want to move there right now, everything is still very
> >>>>> chaotic over there. But before we get too exclusively bubblish we
> >>>>> might consider to keep that option in mind.
>
> >>>>> --
>
> >>>> --
>
> >>> --
>
> >> --
>
> > --
0 comments:
Post a Comment