Re: [Mind's Eye] Re: Why Has Allan Been Barred From The Group ?

For the record: it is exactly the painted business model with its avoidance strategy that I criticize. I will try find other images that say the same but will give me time to be decided upon to be ban-worthy for having formed that opinion.

On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 11:29 AM, Molly <mollyb363@gmail.com> wrote:

Well, we now have three moderators who have agreed to vote on the
issue of banning.  We are a diverse group.  My suggestion is that we
applaud our commonalities instead of criticizing our differences.  We
are back in business.  Let's all do what we can to avoid blowing the
whole thing up again.

On Oct 3, 4:12 am, Vam <atewari2...@gmail.com> wrote:
> " Allan is back " is putting it back on even keel.
>
> " Orn was very considerate." holds the cultural seeds to upsetting the
> evenness without warning !
>
> * sigh *  That's what I suppose the phrase " long haul " means.
>
> As it says, " It is less about oppressors, my dear. It is the patrons
> who kill us with inscrutable intensity !"
>
> On Oct 3, 12:52 pm, archytas <nwte...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > and Orn was very considerate.  Story hopefully ends.
>
> > On Sep 17, 6:10 am, allan deheretic <dehere...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > Do not place the blaming me one you cut off my entire feed allanh1946 so
> > > there was no way to reply only expected messages.
> > > I have been watching tell every how you deleted the offending posts and I
> > > was permanetly banned.
> > > As for being a mediator okay I will be one,  you never asked..
> > > You can ask others if they will accept me.
> > > Allan
> > > On Sep 17, 2011 6:24 AM, "ornamentalmind" <ornsmindseyes...@yahoo.com>
> > > wrote: