On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 1:27 PM, Molly <mollyb363@gmail.com> wrote:
I agree about the "avoidance" part. Been rethinking that since I
posted it.
On Oct 3, 5:48 am, gabbydott <gabbyd...@gmail.com> wrote:
> For the record: it is exactly the painted business model with its avoidance
> strategy that I criticize. I will try find other images that say the same
> but will give me time to be decided upon to be ban-worthy for having formed
> that opinion.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 11:29 AM, Molly <mollyb...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Well, we now have three moderators who have agreed to vote on the
> > issue of banning. We are a diverse group. My suggestion is that we
> > applaud our commonalities instead of criticizing our differences. We
> > are back in business. Let's all do what we can to avoid blowing the
> > whole thing up again.
>
> > On Oct 3, 4:12 am, Vam <atewari2...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > " Allan is back " is putting it back on even keel.
>
> > > " Orn was very considerate." holds the cultural seeds to upsetting the
> > > evenness without warning !
>
> > > * sigh * That's what I suppose the phrase " long haul " means.
>
> > > As it says, " It is less about oppressors, my dear. It is the patrons
> > > who kill us with inscrutable intensity !"
>
> > > On Oct 3, 12:52 pm, archytas <nwte...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > and Orn was very considerate. Story hopefully ends.
>
> > > > On Sep 17, 6:10 am, allan deheretic <dehere...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > Do not place the blaming me one you cut off my entire feed allanh1946
> > so
> > > > > there was no way to reply only expected messages.
> > > > > I have been watching tell every how you deleted the offending posts
> > and I
> > > > > was permanetly banned.
> > > > > As for being a mediator okay I will be one, you never asked..
> > > > > You can ask others if they will accept me.
> > > > > Allan
> > > > > On Sep 17, 2011 6:24 AM, "ornamentalmind" <
> > ornsmindseyes...@yahoo.com>
> > > > > wrote:

0 comments:
Post a Comment