On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 8:35 PM, rigsy03 <rigsy03@gmail.com> wrote:
I prefer to think in terms of subjective and objective realities. Subjective being how an individual builds and interprets his internal model of reality. Objective being the commonalities that most people agree on.
IMO objective reality is the one that is most relevant to humanity in general. Subjective reality is unique to each individual with no two being exactly the same.
I would guess that goes to human curiosity and our desire to know more about ourselves. Without a through understanding how can we know where objective and subjective reality differ?
Well, there are other criteria to judge what is real, for instance:
magical realism, augmented reality, various distortions or visions,
etc. Is reality measured in physical or mental terms?
I prefer to think in terms of subjective and objective realities. Subjective being how an individual builds and interprets his internal model of reality. Objective being the commonalities that most people agree on.
IMO objective reality is the one that is most relevant to humanity in general. Subjective reality is unique to each individual with no two being exactly the same.
Why does reality
need a scientific/logical or spiritual definition if it actually
exists unless the senses are judged to be faulty?
I would guess that goes to human curiosity and our desire to know more about ourselves. Without a through understanding how can we know where objective and subjective reality differ?
0 comments:
Post a Comment