what about prior to the creation / or anomaly , of space ? where and
how then do you mark its end ? to have no begining and no end is
contradictory to the concept of time itself . it is a clever
illusion, but still an illusion.
pol.science kid wrote:
> it is a fantasy that floats through my mind when take the same route to
> walk...when i see the same trees ...the same bushes...the road...the
> rocks....it wonder if these things do not exist in time...for me my added
> memory and perception ttell me i go there for the fortieth time...i walk
> there... i exist in time...but what about that rock...does it exist...in
> time...i know i am not very clear...but ...i have come to know time...with
> my existence...i exist...we exist...we exist in time...like ...bergsons
> accumalation...although i did not go through his complete philosophy...do i
> go and meet the day...that has already been prepared...not to enter into
> determinism...it is majorly with time i am concerned...the ripples have
> already spanned and intermingled have they...forgive me if i become
> inarticulate
>
> On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 7:25 PM, Chuck Bowling <
> aardvarkstudio.chuckb@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > My thoughts on time are a little bit technical. To talk about it I'll need
> > to pull together multiple ideas.
> >
> > To start, there are two different sets of rules for understanding
> > spacetime. The first are the rules that the macro universe obey. These are
> > the rules that define the reality that we can see and hear.
> >
> > The second set of rules are rules for the quantum universe. These rules
> > appear to have very little to do with the way we understand the universe at
> > the macro level. The quantum universe is a universe that consists entirely
> > of probabilities.
> >
> > One of the ideas having a fundamental impact on the quantum universe is
> > something called a Planck length. This is the distance at which the effects
> > of the quantum universe become more apparent than the effects of the
> > macroverse.
> >
> > In the quantum universe a particle is actually both a particle and a
> > probability wave that can exist in multiple places at the same time or can
> > appear in one location and in the next instant appear half way across the
> > universe (although the probability of this happening is very low it is still
> > possible).
> >
> > A very fundamental concept is the idea of a cycle or oscillation. Every
> > particle of energy or matter in the universe vibrates at a given frequency.
> >
> > Now, imagine dropping two stones into a pond. The ripples that spread out
> > from each stone intermingle creating troughs and hills of interference with
> > each other. I think that time is the intermingling interference pattern of a
> > nearly infinite number of particles interacting with each other.
> >
> > On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 2:55 AM, the taoist shaman <bryanobo@gmail.com>wrote:
> >
> >> is time real or an illusion created by change ? if indeed time is an
> >> illusion created by change shurely this must have meaning, some
> >> ramification on , at the least, the way we preceive ourselves and our
> >> universe to which we are a part . if so what is the effect of this
> >> altered preception?
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> \--/ Peace
0 comments:
Post a Comment