[Mind's Eye] Re: Just a thought...

The concept of collective mind is largely rejected by collective
consciousness researchers. I use the terms collective mind along with
mind space to describe the collective field phenomenon, synchronicity
and morphic field. It is amazing to me that the general populus does
not recognize these phenomenon but I imagine it has much to do with
control and continuity of power. There is "real" and "conscious"
energy available to everyone that comes out of vacum space and at the
ZPF.
"The gift of mental power comes from God, Divine Being, and if
we concentrate our minds on that truth, we become in tune with this
great power. My Mother had taught me to seek all truth in the Bible;
therefore I devoted the next few months to the study of this work."-
Nikola Tesla
It is my opinion that by aligning our mind's frequencies to that
which is positive or "good" in nature that we not only are able to tap
into these fields but also we are able to tap our creative powers
instantaniously.

On May 2, 1:30 pm, RP Singh <123...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Would you shed a little light on " collective mind ".
>
> On Mon, May 2, 2011 at 7:36 PM, DarkwaterBlight
>
>
>
> <douglas.bli...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > This take appeals to my understanding. Perpetually changing, evolving
> > and reforming. Input has an outcome and causes an expanded "mind
> > space", if you will. Is logic all logical and what is to be said about
> > rationalizing the "irrational"? Should my thinking be correct by the
> > standards of others or to my own? What of "raising the bar" in
> > consciousness and of a paradigm shift to a more correct thinking of
> > our "collective mind" ? Of all that goes into into thought and mind is
> > this not the desired effect?
>
> > On Apr 30, 9:23 am, "pol.science kid" <r.freeb...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> might thought be colored by the mind that engages it ....what is the realm
> >> of pure thought that you mention here .... is it logic and
> >> rationalisation...do you mean the method of employing that thought...because
> >> ....knowing...percieving something for the first time the mind will
> >> automatically fall back on the things it thinks it does know....
>
> >> On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 11:22 AM, Chad Moore <nis...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >  Knowledge unites, in being or in identity. Thinking separates, in
> >> > subject-object relationship.
> >> > Knowing has no place in the ordinary thought process. Thinking about
> >> > something
> >> > which has to be known is wrong, since it moves in a vicious circle. You
> >> > cannot think
> >> > of anything you have not known. Such thinking can never take you to the
> >> > Truth.
> >> > But when you direct your thought to something (say yourself) which you have
> >> > otherwise
> >> > visualized, the thought loses its own characteristics and limits, and
> >> > stands
> >> > revealed as that Self (Consciousness) itself. Thought is thus reduced into
> >> > its essence.
>
> >> --
> >> \--/ Peace- Hide quoted text -
>
> >> - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -