birth to the rebel.. i do not mean to undermine individual
effort...but to think about it...its like a self re-generating
thing...huh..
On May 3, 6:09 am, rigsy03 <rigs...@gmail.com> wrote:
> But you have to admit there are humans who haven't the chance to even
> consider this type of thinking as their lives are miserable due to
> poverty, war, sickness and all other ills. Plus- what does a culture
> celebrate? Wealth? Power? Etc.? You can hardly fault some for buying a
> false self and image if that is what their culture teaches them, can
> you? It takes a brave rebel to contradict society or challenge group
> thought.
>
> On May 2, 12:20 pm, gabbydott <gabbyd...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > If the selfish would truly search their self, they'd quickly die out.
> > Problem is how they don't see themselves but see themselves in the others
> > with the poor others not knowing that they are not taken for themselves but
> > for someone else. My explanation.
>
> > On Mon, May 2, 2011 at 6:57 PM, pol.science kid <r.freeb...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
> > > at the first glance of your reply came a thought to my mind about
> > > collective consciousness...rather a question...does the collective
> > > consciousness exist independently...what does it mean exactly...to put it
> > > crudely is it the realisation that you are not the only phenomena..but what
> > > i feel is....it is very difficult to transcend ones own person...but is it
> > > important....why do we really get irritated with self absorbed or self
> > > seeking people....why do we condemn selfishness..in any sense...are we so
> > > insecure as to feel deprived because of that ...or is it something more.. i
> > > hope i make sense.. and i hope you get waht i am trying to ask...i would
> > > like all to answer...cos i really want to know....
>
> > > On Mon, May 2, 2011 at 7:36 PM, DarkwaterBlight <douglas.bli...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
> > >> This take appeals to my understanding. Perpetually changing, evolving
> > >> and reforming. Input has an outcome and causes an expanded "mind
> > >> space", if you will. Is logic all logical and what is to be said about
> > >> rationalizing the "irrational"? Should my thinking be correct by the
> > >> standards of others or to my own? What of "raising the bar" in
> > >> consciousness and of a paradigm shift to a more correct thinking of
> > >> our "collective mind" ? Of all that goes into into thought and mind is
> > >> this not the desired effect?
>
> > >> On Apr 30, 9:23 am, "pol.science kid" <r.freeb...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >> > might thought be colored by the mind that engages it ....what is the
> > >> realm
> > >> > of pure thought that you mention here .... is it logic and
> > >> > rationalisation...do you mean the method of employing that
> > >> thought...because
> > >> > ....knowing...percieving something for the first time the mind will
> > >> > automatically fall back on the things it thinks it does know....
>
> > >> > On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 11:22 AM, Chad Moore <nis...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >> > > Knowledge unites, in being or in identity. Thinking separates, in
> > >> > > subject-object relationship.
> > >> > > Knowing has no place in the ordinary thought process. Thinking about
> > >> > > something
> > >> > > which has to be known is wrong, since it moves in a vicious circle.
> > >> You
> > >> > > cannot think
> > >> > > of anything you have not known. Such thinking can never take you to
> > >> the
> > >> > > Truth.
> > >> > > But when you direct your thought to something (say yourself) which you
> > >> have
> > >> > > otherwise
> > >> > > visualized, the thought loses its own characteristics and limits, and
> > >> > > stands
> > >> > > revealed as that Self (Consciousness) itself. Thought is thus reduced
> > >> into
> > >> > > its essence.
>
> > >> > --
> > >> > \--/ Peace- Hide quoted text -
>
> > >> > - Show quoted text -
>
> > > --
> > > \--/ Peace- Hide quoted text -
>
> > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
0 comments:
Post a Comment