[Mind's Eye] Re: Just a thought...

This take appeals to my understanding. Perpetually changing, evolving
and reforming. Input has an outcome and causes an expanded "mind
space", if you will. Is logic all logical and what is to be said about
rationalizing the "irrational"? Should my thinking be correct by the
standards of others or to my own? What of "raising the bar" in
consciousness and of a paradigm shift to a more correct thinking of
our "collective mind" ? Of all that goes into into thought and mind is
this not the desired effect?

On Apr 30, 9:23 am, "pol.science kid" <r.freeb...@gmail.com> wrote:
> might thought be colored by the mind that engages it ....what is the realm
> of pure thought that you mention here .... is it logic and
> rationalisation...do you mean the method of employing that thought...because
> ....knowing...percieving something for the first time the mind will
> automatically fall back on the things it thinks it does know....
>
>
>
>
>
> On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 11:22 AM, Chad Moore <nis...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >  Knowledge unites, in being or in identity. Thinking separates, in
> > subject-object relationship.
> > Knowing has no place in the ordinary thought process. Thinking about
> > something
> > which has to be known is wrong, since it moves in a vicious circle. You
> > cannot think
> > of anything you have not known. Such thinking can never take you to the
> > Truth.
> > But when you direct your thought to something (say yourself) which you have
> > otherwise
> > visualized, the thought loses its own characteristics and limits, and
> > stands
> > revealed as that Self (Consciousness) itself. Thought is thus reduced into
> > its essence.
>
> --
> \--/ Peace- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -