greatly
appreciated! " – Ash
I suggest that delving into philosophy that is not practical is at the
very least a waste of time…entertainment at best.
When searching for universals, until one can know the innate divine
forms found within us all… all else is but a cyclical set of random
and meaningless dream-like activities.
So, in this sense, one must know what it is to be a human being before
the rest is knowable.
On Apr 4, 2:30 pm, Ash <ashkas...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Well met OM, thanks! I cannot vouch (however little it counts for ;-) ) for
> pure forms really beyond what seems obvious in natural phenomena- there seem
> innate 'behavioral' characteristics to systems but mainly see this as
> unfolding from their properties having varying expressions under varying
> conditions. Much of this I think appies to beings, animals, and social
> systems too, not just simpler mechanical phenomena. Basically statistical
> norms and whatnot being innate ingredients to the creature, and
> interestingly they can morph and change as the creatures do (ghosts in the
> machine even!).
>
> I have been moving away from the philosophical matters a bit, mainly because
> I find the challenge of identifying natural explanations more interesting.
> That small changes in nature can have such significant impact on behavior of
> animals is fascinating, and even inspiring when considering how dynamic a
> species humanity can be. This sounds like a non-committal response, I guess
> we are seeking universals in our own ways. The search for such forms tells
> me that we have been seeking answers to repeating patterns in humanity and
> our environments, that too is inspiring to me. Don't get me wrong, I have my
> own philosophical/romantic biases, but philosophy keeps taking me down long
> and difficult roads I am learning to avoid by seeking alternate and
> pragmatic routes.
>
> Any insights or guidance you have found useful in this regard is greatly
> appreciated!
0 comments:
Post a Comment