[Mind's Eye] Re: Given that it is almost impossible to be an individual

Ash, as is obvious to most, gabby is attacking the person (http://
www.don-lindsay-archive.org/skeptic/arguments.html#hominem ) rather
than the ideas. That and a projection as to my theological stance
which is clearly not one that I have ever said I identified with only
leave one with a vague nausea and a hope to a return to something
other than simple trolling.

I am quite happy that you found the core notions of the post to be of
interest and/or use. As to a 'competing theory', that which is
lacking as you so rightly address ...and for good reason... I wouldn't
hold my breath.

On Apr 30, 8:05 pm, Ash <ashkas...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > I am sorry to disappoint you Ash, but there is no competing theories here.
> > All is one. OM.
>
> Should I take this to mean that you have a conciliatory view on the proposed
> views? That would be interesting, and someone should put forward the
> potential argument behind it even if that's not what you're saying..