reaction
On Mar 30, 2:15 pm, the taoist shaman <bryan...@gmail.com> wrote:
> i dont see how any decent individal couldnt want that ~ yet there is
> no movement twards it ~
>
>
>
> leerevdoug...@googlemail.com wrote:
> > Bryan I'm with you 100% on this one.
>
> > Much of the worlds ills can be put down to simple love of money. Take
> > away the money, find a better way, I'm all for that.
>
> > On Mar 29, 7:28 pm, Bryan Oboczky <bryan...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Why should there b welth at all ? No welth no control +equality
> > > why does it have to be about my finantal situation. What about the
> > > people rationing water and food . People u never met ~nor have i ~...
> > > Lazarus... And once again the exact stats of welth dont matter/the
> > > point is the same~so yes i hold responsible the rich and system of $
> > > in general
>
> > > On 3/29/11, allan deheretic <dehere...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > It is not necessarily unimportant, last time I played cards for money (over
> > > > 32 years ago) I sat at a black jack table and started with $80 and when I
> > > > quit I had over $28,000.oo in chips in my pocket.. in the game the put in
> > > > two shill dealers against me. I lost my job as a dealer over it, also
> > > > decided it was immoral. So I quit gambling.. point is you never know who
> > > > you are playing against.
>
> > > > If you want a redistribution of wealth then it requires a wise plan and
> > > > massive amounts of knowledge. It is possible but to do it you would need to
> > > > totally stay away from drugs.. and then understand your beliefs and then how
> > > > create a church to keep the wealth from evaporating or ending up in
> > > > an individuals hands.. You will need to understand funds and economic
> > > > development.. as well as keeping it working for all the people. It is a
> > > > tricky path to walk. but possible .. lol one step at a time.
> > > > Allan
>
> > > > On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 4:05 PM, the taoist shaman
> > > > <bryan...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
> > > >> i know its not realistic , u being better at cards than me is beside
> > > >> the point , its not 500 to 50 its 1 holding 98 to 99 holding 2 , if u
> > > >> think thats a fair playing feild and that were not going to end up
> > > >> slaves to the rich?! so what ,its adog eat dog world and thats that?!
> > > >> FTS! and how many people would prefer poverty and gov. control over
> > > >> freedom and prosparety ! the rich and the politician , but soon the
> > > >> politician will be the only one to hold wleth, capitalism is coming
> > > >> to an end , if one person or group holds all $ there is no money only
> > > >> compleate control, but this would cause revolution , so u throw a bone
> > > >> for the dog to chew and keep him bussy and happy , dosile, r u a dog ,
> > > >> am I !
>
> > > >> leerevdoug...@googlemail.com wrote:
> > > >> > Your card game anology does not take into account the skill of the
> > > >> > players.
>
> > > >> > I'm in fact a very good card player and I recon if you start with $500
> > > >> > and I $50 then there is a slightly less than even chance I'll take all
> > > >> > of your money.
>
> > > >> > On Mar 29, 1:38 pm, the taoist shaman <bryan...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >> > > organized world wide revelution, this conversation is proof of fast
> > > >> > > easy communication , if evryone picks up a gun at the same time, to
> > > >> > > rebell against all gov..... . . . there would or course ,
> > > >> > > afterwards , need to be NON PROFIT organizations set up by the
> > > >> > > people for transportation and equal distrabution of goods - evryone
> > > >> > > pulls weight- if u want to go to school to be a doctor u reward is
> > > >> > > pride and doing good for others- the greedy selfseeking people of the
> > > >> > > world who diminish the quality of life for litteraly billions of
> > > >> > > others - would have nothing to leech off
>
> > > >> > > if we play a game of cards and i start withh 500$ to evryone elses 50$
> > > >> > > - and i dont take every last bit of $ from evryone else
> > > >> > > - .... . . . well , i would have to be stupid - or evryone else
> > > >> > > would have to quit the game befor i took everything thay had - and if
> > > >> > > they didnt , they would have to be stupid.
>
> > > >> > > i think its time we quit the game
>
> > > >> > > leerevdoug...@googlemail.com wrote:
> > > >> > > > What do you propose?
>
> > > >> > > > On Mar 28, 12:03 am, the taoist shaman <bryan...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >> > > > > 98% of the worlds welth is held by 1% of the population .........
> > > >> even
> > > >> > > > > gov. that isnt capitalist is subjected to capitalism ...... the
> > > >> entire
> > > >> > > > > world is...... what happens when 100% is held by 1% , how do we
> > > >> > > > > all
> > > >> > > > > accept this, because thats the way it is? are we a colony of ants
> > > >> > > > > working for our queen because we are told to?....... are we so
> > > >> simple
> > > >> > > > > as a species the we will accept what situation were given untill
> > > >> > > > > it
> > > >> > > > > gets so bad that we have to fight
>
> > > >> > > > > if theres a storm on the horizon do u wate for it to come before
> > > >> > > > > taking shelter ?- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > >> > > - Show quoted text -
>
> > > > --
> > > > (
> > > > )
> > > > I_D Allan
>
> > > > If you can bear to hear the truth you've spoken
> > > > Twisted by knaves to make a trap for fools,- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
0 comments:
Post a Comment