Re: Mind's Eye Globalization, a threat to mankind

Yes- we have globalized opinions leading to riots, strikes, wars,
character assassinations, etc. Opinions do not put bread on the table
or a chicken in the pot ( but some states are embracing pot- might be
a good source of revenue). So rather than a global benefit, a good
deal of recent tech advancement is still for profit and spurred by
individual or national/ethnic self-interest. We are still letting poor
leaders off the hook who should be the ones taking care of/guiding
their own people. In fact, globalization may make matters worse. (Will
have to think about this.)

On Nov 18, 2:47 pm, Allan H <allanh1...@gmail.com> wrote:
> globalization can be very beneficial and granted there are many self
> centered individuals and corporations that have that have little
> concern for others or our world..  but one thing that is coming out of
> it they can not control what people thing and desire their world to
> be..  Little by little I see people reclaiming the dreams of a better
> world.
> Oh well what can you expect from an old hippie
> Allan
>
>
>
> On Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 7:43 PM, archytas <nwte...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Andrew is obviously right when one considers where our wealth is
> > ending-up.  This group is broadly parochial, white and barely
> > understands what it excludes and how.  We are reliant on centralised
> > technology that is soon to force us to a format we don't want.
> > Rigsy's question is about right.  Previous globalisation was
> > colonising and I suspect most of what we are witnessing now is in that
> > model.  It would be good to make the move in emphasis Molly suggests,
> > but the signs in the underlying business model indicate the opposite
> > to me - currently remaining in advertising and making a killing in
> > market share.  There is another (dated) form of globalisation in the
> > phrase 'workers of the world unite' and it must be clear this has been
> > resisted by the powerful other than in their own 'guilds'.  My list on
> > what globalisation is would be long and rather vague - including
> > teaching foreign students with bare English textbook answers I kn ow
> > to be rot.  James Bond has globalised but not decent water, food and
> > housing for all - let alone freedom from the kind of idiots on all
> > sides who keep such stuff as the Arab-Israeli conflict going.
>
> > We need realistic optimism - but this means embracing really bad news
> > on climate (worse than we think) and history (much worse than we
> > think) in order to see how we get some decent stuff done amongst the
> > enemies of open society.  Globalisation is getting very real in the
> > sense of telepresence (I could be operated on in Bolton by a surgeon
> > in Madras) and other varieties of the embodiment of knowledge that
> > will allow remote and even home manufacturing.
>
> > Postmodernism (which I regard as the move to modernism we have never
> > had) is bringing about a legitimation crisis.  I am broadly (but not
> > completely) free of the religious dross taught in youth and chronic
> > copy-teachers who told me Julius Caesar invaded Britain in 53AD and
> > that humans have 24 pairs of chromosomes like other apes.  To discover
> > the extent of ideological dross in my education I travelled.  The
> > Internet's supposedly global reach does  not even compare.  How could
> > anything be more parochial that Faceflop and Twatter?  What would be
> > want to globalise - does anyone ever ask us?  How about freedom from
> > work as means of income?
>
> > On 18 Nov, 14:11, Molly <mollyb...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> I disagree, Andrew, and take a view more like Alan's.  Globalization
> >> occurs when more folks operate from a world-centric life view (not ego-
> >> centric or ethno-centric), more countries are trading goods and
> >> services, and more folks have access to goods and services from other
> >> countries.  This group is comprised of folks from many different parts
> >> of the world.  A good example.
>
> >> On Nov 18, 4:09 am, andrew vecsey <andrewvec...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >> > Globalization is reverting to the ownership and control of everything world
> >> > wide by the few. That is the danger of it all.
>
> >> > On Saturday, November 17, 2012 7:41:31 PM UTC+1, Allan Heretic wrote:
>
> >> > > I think realistically globalization is revering to the access to
> >> > > everything world wide
> >> > > Allan
>
> >> > > On Sat, Nov 17, 2012 at 3:19 PM, rigsy03 <rig...@yahoo.com <javascript:>>
> >> > > wrote:
> >> > > > But what does the term "globalization" mean? It is an abstract term.
> >> > > > (Sort of like Alexander's "empire" at his death- to be defined by the
> >> > > > strongest?)
>
> >> > > > On Nov 17, 4:18 am, Allan H <allanh1...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> > > >> I agree with you Saris are very beautiful and believe me that can get
> >> > > >> into the pricey range. Her wedding saris was well over 30,000 Euro and
> >> > > >> her mothers was just as bad..  was never told the exact price..  but
> >> > > >> it was out of the finest silk..
>
> >> > > >> There are benefits to globalization ,, unfortunately those benefits
> >> > > >> are easily destroyed by those people and companies that are extremely
> >> > > >> selfish and uncaring...  Greedy is to soft a word for their
> >> > > >> activities..
> >> > > >> Allan
>
> >> > > >> On Sat, Nov 17, 2012 at 2:16 AM, rigsy03 <rigs...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >> > > >> > A great question- what is it? Maybe it is what the major powers/
> >> > > >> > economies tell us it is. Facts betray the huge inequities among the
> >> > > >> > nations/humanity. I would hope we don't lose some of our differences
> >> > > >> > and adopt one style and language. Saris are my favorite to watch and
> >> > > >> > think Indian and Asian women beat out Americans- the men aren't bad
> >> > > >> > either. Remember when we were all so separated and the "other" seemed
> >> > > >> > to look the same- a kind of blindness, I guess.
>
> >> > > >> > On Nov 15, 8:47 pm, archytas <nwte...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> > > >> >> The big question is what is globalising.  In part this is stuff we
> >> > > >> >> don't want.  We are still haunted by superstition, sexism and
> >> > > >> >> imperialism.  I'd like to see more of our economies about building
> >> > > >> >> safe communities and see foreign policies and our limited vision of
> >> > > >> >> 'efficiency' as the major bars to this.  Disease is likely
> >> > > >> >> globalising, the ability to make WMDs and take part in manufacturing
> >> > > >> >> for war.
>
> >> > > >> >> On 15 Nov, 23:34, rigsy03 <rigs...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> >> > > >> >> > I would substitute ignorance for indifference.
>
> >> > > >> >> > On Nov 15, 10:00 am, Vam <atewari2...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >> > > >> >> > > Untill nationalisn has distinctive meaning, political and
> >> > > cultural, and
> >> > > >> >> > > economic, free movement of people can only be a pipe dream.
>
> >> > > >> >> > > And the "meaning," it must be remembered, is an emotional -
> >> > > mental thing...
> >> > > >> >> > > not merely intellectual. That's how phenomenal dimensions of any
> >> > > thing
> >> > > >> >> > > extends ... from indifference to emotional values, covering
> >> > > almost
> >> > > >> >> > > everything existential in society, politics and economics ...
> >> > > and to
> >> > > >> >> > > intellectual conviction, which is singularly absent in
> >> > > everything
> >> > > >> >> > > experiential that individuals bring into their attitudes and
> >> > > everyday
> >> > > >> >> > > decision-making at their present level evolution.
>
> >> > > >> >> > > One of the most intellectual calls was issued by Marx. No one
> >> > > could stand
> >> > > >> >> > > up to its rigour ... not the champions and subscribers, not the
> >> > > staus
> >> > > >> >> > > quoist rest of the world. Capitalism stays, because it factors
> >> > > in our
> >> > > >> >> > > emotional drives, not because it is most just and fair to the
> >> > > weakest in
> >> > > >> >> > > our midst !
>
> >> > > >> >> > > Au revoir ...
>
> >> > > >> >> > > On Thursday, November 15, 2012 8:15:49 PM UTC+5:30, Lee Douglas
> >> > > wrote:
>
> >> > > >> >> > > > Meh!  As you know I'm all for freedom of movement, live where
> >> > > you like, if
> >> > > >> >> > > > much of India wish to migrate to The USA and settle in the Mid
> >> > > West then go
> >> > > >> >> > > > to it.  However with around only 3-5% of Earth's land mass
> >> > > populated and
> >> > > >> >> > > > with an increasing amount of that population living in urban
> >> > > environments I
> >> > > >> >> > > > daresay that India has much land of it's own in which it's
> >> > > residents can
> >> > > >> >> > > > settle.  Even when much of the land is gone, we are in fact
> >> > > making strides
> >> > > >> >> > > > for sea based habitat.
>
> >> > > >> >> > > > Over population is a concern, much, much more for reasons of
> >> > > food
> >> > > >> >> > > > and energy production though than any reasons of not enough
> >> > > land mass.
>
> >> > > >> >> > > > On Thursday, 15 November 2012 14:15:16 UTC, Allan Heretic
> >> > > wrote:
>
> >> > > >> >> > > >> Okay there is large sections of farm land in the Mid west
> >> > >  maybe we
> >> > > >> >> > > >> can help the people of India  resettle into that area..??
> >> > > >> >> > > >> Allan
>
> >> > > >> >> > > >> On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 2:34 PM, Lee Douglas <
> >> > > leerev...@gmail.com>
> >> > > >> >> > > >> wrote:
> >> > > >> >> > > >> > Umm myself I can't see globalisation as anything but a good
> >> > > thing.  The
> >> > > >> >> > > >> > sooner we find that our cultural differences do not matter
> >> > > and we learn
> >> > > >> >> > > >> to
> >> > > >> >> > > >> > judge the individual(as opposed to the group) the better as
> >> > > far as I'm
> >> > > >> >> > > >> > concerned.  Ultimately it will take global working together
> >> > > to sort out
> >> > > >> >> > > >> the
> >> > > >> >> > > >> > worlds ills.
>
> >> > > >> >> > > >> > Overpopulation is a concern, but to too much of one at this
> >> > > moment in
> >> > > >> >> > > >> time,
> >> > > >> >> > > >> > there are huge tracts of land still to be settled.
>
> >> > > >> >> > > >> > On Tuesday, 13 November 2012 20:22:17 UTC, archytas wrote:
>
> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> One of the Faust stories more or less predicts the
> >> > > mechanism for the
> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> rise of Nazi Germany including the funding.
>
> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> On 13 Nov, 19:33, Allan H <allanh1...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > Wetlands are very important.  The recovery work here was
> >> > > done
> >> > > >> >> > > >> centuries
> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > ago.. and here we are very eco awe.
>
> ...
>
> read more »- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

--