Re: Mind's Eye Copy write

have a good day Gabby

Allan

On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 9:48 AM, gabbydott <gabbydott@gmail.com> wrote:

You too, Allan. But only slightly. :)

On Wednesday, August 29, 2012, Allan H wrote:

Your parents were right to copy write you Gabby you are totally unique and original.

Allan

On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 2:02 PM, gabbydott <gabbydott@gmail.com> wrote:

I don't know, Don. My parents had the copyright on me and I don't see
how that has had an overall posive effect on their financial sucess.
And the patented right and obligation to raise me was definitely not a
pure joy and pleasure. And you know what, and don't even think that
this was their intention. That social blabla, that you pay your local
church for, was most likely the reason that made me survive.

On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 8:11 AM, Don Johnson <dajohn@gmail.com> wrote:
> I think it's one of America's finest achievements replacing
> aristocracy with financial success as a mark of distinction. We can
> all aspire to the later but only a "precious" few can claim the
> former. You can thank George Washington. The man could have been king.
>
> Let us not forget how many people Apple employs, how much the
> corporation and their employees pay in taxes and all the taxes made
> from the sales of the equipment they innovated. Lets not forget the
> many, many jobs poor folks in China have due to Apple's manufacturing
> plant there. And what, pray tell, is wrong with creating new markets?
> At least apple's products are actually useful unlike a certain tulip
> that used to bring a pretty penny hey?
>
> I am a Consumer and will continue to be until the day I die and even
> after. I'll have to be planted/burned up and the funeral home will
> make a big fuss(for a fee) and the newspaper will have a little
> blurb(for a fee) and so on so forth. As it should be. Why cry about
> it? Trade in goods and services are what makes humans so successful as
> a species. Our ability to work together. Without it we would still be
> the savages we no doubt are descendent from.
>
> As for the patents my understand is that they are for the technology
> involved in how the tablet responds to digital manipulation on the
> screen. If Moses had a tablet like that I'm damn impressed and if it
> can be proven I'll reevaluate my entire stand on this God thing. I
> mean, I can explain a burning bush with lightening but a touch screen
> in 1441 BC requires some deity assistance wouldn't you say? Or maybe
> time travel...
>
> I have this image of Steve Jobs busting tablets when he comes down off
> the mountain and catches his flock building false images. You
> know.................Android.
>
> Really like the "clutters the caverns of commerce" line Rigsy. I
> couldn't agree with you more. Although the gothic cathedrals are a
> little too big and overbearing(intended) for my tastes I'm more of a
> Howard Roark(aka Frank Lloyd Wright) kind of man.
>
> dj
>
> On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 5:24 PM, archytas <nwterry@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I don't doubt we need some process to help innovation along.  I no
>> doubt asset rights to my novel and day-job productions of academic
>> programmes.  Molly is welcome to hers.  Newsnight discussed the issue
>> around the quote rigsy comes up with above.  The problem is when the
>> process establishes unnecessary economic rents.
>>
>> On 28 Aug, 15:33, Allan H <allanh1...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> You are right Molly,  Apple did go though the government process for both a
>>> patent and copyrights,,  but typical of lawyers they lie via ommision..
>>>   the slate board was never patented either in the US or world wide so in
>>> their searches they can claim they never found it..
>>>
>>> In a way they are telling the truth ant the same time lying .. You have a
>>> automatic copy write  and if you put a copy of your work in a
>>> sealed envelope then mail it to yourself  as long as the envelope is you
>>> have proof of date of origin..  you do not have to go though the copy write
>>> process.
>>>
>>> When the design argument comes up a slate tablet from the 17th or 18th or
>>> early 19th century would proof of original creation.  and invalid that part
>>> of the copy write claim.  Today the world is about bullshit and high priced
>>> lawyers.  A simple slate tablet showing up in the court room would
>>> invalidate their claim..  but then the lawyers would not get rich over it..
>>>
>>> Now my opinion..  the lawyers should have to contribute twice there

--

--
 (

  )

|_D Allan

Life is for moral, ethical and truthful living.

--
 
 
 

--
 
 
 

--
 (

  )

|_D Allan

Life is for moral, ethical and truthful living.

--