Hi RP, agreeing with Vam on that level of exchange will only lead to a continuation of an infinitive perpetuation of I-am-more-evolved-than-you-because-I-have-seen-less-ghosts. An unconstructive waste of time, if you ask me.
I'd rather converse with you and suggest:
The hypothesis is that 360 has a different quality from 180 although both add up to 9.
Applying this, this means that the 180 degrees perspective of defining being dead as unachievable by a living being is as right or wrong as defining death from a dynamic point of view. I remember when traveling by car as a child, how it struck me as odd how the sun and the moon always seemed to follow me.
On Sun, Mar 18, 2012 at 9:58 AM, RP Singh <1234rp@gmail.com> wrote:
Some people believe in an after-life because some people claim to
remember past births , experience is on their side , they say. You
might as well believe in ghosts and ghouls because some people claim
to have experienced them. So much for experience !
On Sun, Mar 18, 2012 at 3:07 AM, Vam <atewari2007@gmail.com> wrote:
> How do you know that, RP, when your dead ? Have you ever died before ?
>
> We all have a body and a mind. Based on its capabilities, or
> incapabilities, what are we talking about ? Nature ? We hardly know
> what, how much, how far, in what ways... it works, in all the 10 to
> power 22 star worlds. What we know of it can hardly determine what we
> do know about it, quite as the past can hardly define the future !
>
> Likewise, God. WTF are we talking about ? Now this could seem rude but
> should make perfect sense in the context. As in what is this God ?
> What constitutes it ? How does it relate to that other fog word "
> Nature " ?
>
> I sincerely believe such threads are started on account of something
> diseased within us !
>
> Healthy people should be talking of matters they know or have
> experienced. One can then opine, extrapolate, theorise... and still be
> understandable.
>
> On Mar 17, 11:26 pm, Allan H <allanh1...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Good
>> Allan
>> On Mar 17, 2012 5:28 PM, "RP Singh" <123...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> > As long as I am alive I am conscious of the world and myself , but when I
>> > am dead I reach a state of permanent unconsciousness , a state of supreme
>> > peace where nothing disturbs me , a sort of nirvana. that is the ultimate
>> > state from which nobody returns.
>>
>> > On Friday, March 9, 2012 3:32:12 AM UTC+5:30, Ash wrote:
>>
>> >> This does make some sense to me RP so I hope my question doesn't sound
>> >> critical. For me thinking in this way causes a massive amount of
>> >> difficulty, as it sounds like immutable truths, so I have to translate
>> >> away the language to get glints of my own thinking through. We could
>> >> easily call my predicament not seeing the forest for the trees, and
>> >> that would be a fitting if not limited statement. In my mind I prefer
>> >> to start with the will representing laws of nature which are dynamic,
>> >> and work more along an opportunistic heuristic. For me it is obvious
>> >> that some people talk about an n-dimensional entity, but n is an
>> >> aspect of scope in one's perspective. If n is potentially infinite,
>> >> then the truths may have strength but are more optimizations than
>> >> static ontology. I am wondering if there is some useful perspective
>> >> that can be used in my situation, or perhaps it is a hopeless case.
>> >> Perhaps you have something to help me?
>>
>> >> On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 4:21 AM, RP Singh <123...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> > Neil , there is no difference. The universe is not nature but a
>> >> > manifestation of Nature or God. It is unconscious but not dead, as
>> >> > that would have meant no life , further it has to be unconscious as
>> >> > the conscious is always bound to certain limits and is dual.
>>
>> >> > On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 3:57 AM, archytas <nwte...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> >> That's a little bit different - and I'm in agreement. Some scientists
>> >> >> have suggested we could make a universe with life conditions in the
>> >> >> laboratory - still leaving us with issues about beginnings. Science
>> >> >> fiction wise one can imagine making such universes in order to travel
>> >> >> in time in them to discover more on how we were made - by occupying
>> >> >> earlier stages of them. I tend to think of the unconscious as what
>> >> >> isn't in rational consciousness, but I know this is inadequate as much
>> >> >> human consciousness in action is not known to the participants
>> >> >> rationally.
>>
>> >> >> On Mar 5, 2:59 am, RP Singh <123...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> >>> Life had to come from somewhere , why not from an unconscious Nature
>> >> >>> which would explain the presence of Laws behind every action and
>> >> >>> inaction.
>>
>> >> >>> On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 2:36 AM, archytas <nwte...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> >>> > That doesn't help RP. Why this rather than a host of alternatives?
>>
>> >> >>> > On Mar 4, 4:28 pm, RP Singh <123...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> >>> >> God is not made of fire , air , earth , water , ether and
>> >> consciousness ,
>> >> >>> >> rather all these emanate from Him. God is unconscious and without
>> >> >>> >> attributes.
>>
>> >> >>> >> On Sunday, January 29, 2012 8:51:49 PM UTC+5:30, RP Singh wrote:
>>
>> >> >>> >> > God , Nature , Truth , Reality is unconscious and the Creation
>> >> which
>> >> >>> >> > emanates from it has no choice. You may think that you have
>> >> choice , but
>> >> >>> >> > whatever you think , feel and do is as certain as the trajectory
>> >> of the
>> >> >>> >> > celestial bodies. The entire universe , you included, is bound
>> >> by laws and
>> >> >>> >> > everyone is a slave to" Laws", that is , "The Will of God".
>> >> >>> >> On Sunday, January 29, 2012 8:51:49 PM UTC+5:30, RP Singh wrote:
>>
>> >> >>> >> > God , Nature , Truth , Reality is unconscious and the Creation
>> >> which
>> >> >>> >> > emanates from it has no choice. You may think that you have
>> >> choice , but
>> >> >>> >> > whatever you think , feel and do is as certain as the trajectory
>> >> of the
>> >> >>> >> > celestial bodies. The entire universe , you included, is bound
>> >> by laws and
>> >> >>> >> > everyone is a slave to" Laws", that is , "The Will of God".
0 comments:
Post a Comment