> Sorry for the blank post, getting used to a new lappy :/. I am curious
> how you approach the challenging boundaries between spiritual and
> naturalist perspectives, though I think much of our conflict is
> cultural in that regard it would be refreshing to hear new and
> intriguing thoughts integrating a large spectrum of inquiry without
> reducing them all to one standpoint alone.
>
Then you'll like the book! Most of the answers to your questions are
answered in it. I'll return, though, to this and say more--again, I'm
running out of time!
> It would be neat to hear your thoughts on how what we know of
> knowledge helped your theory development and challenges that were
> overcome. Looking forward to seeing reviews around on the book, and
> reading it too of course!
>
>
>
> On Fri, Dec 2, 2011 at 9:04 AM, Pat <PatrickDHarring...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> > On Nov 17, 9:49 pm, Vam <atewari2...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> Good luck, Pat ! I'm sure you have it from all others on this list
> >> who've known you.
>
> >> Whether you're held up, are sauntering or are hurtling through your
> >> future... keep us posted.
>
> > I'll try! Today's bit of news is that the RRP has been set: £19.99.
> > So, it's off to the printer's now. Oh, and, of course, there's been
> > another change in the cover design. Now, I'ts going to have a
> > chalkboard on it with wording as follows:
>
> > -----------------------------------
> > And God said,
>
> > "( (E=MC^2) and (E=Fh) )--> ( (M<-->F) --> (h/C^2) )"
>
> > And there was light!
> > -----------------------------------
>
> > Hopefully, the combination of scripture and equations will get the
> > message across, as well as hit the funny bone.
>
> > In a couple of weeks, once I have a copy available, the local
> > newspaper, The Banbury Guardian, will, most likely, run a story about
> > it. They'd run it now, but they want a picture of me WITH the book in
> > order to get the best publicity out of it. They're angle will be
> > that, not only does the book bring science and religion together but
> > also explains 'dark energy' and 'the arrow of time', which are ground-
> > breaking.
>
> >> On Nov 17, 8:22 pm, Pat <PatrickDHarring...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> >> > On Nov 3, 10:00 pm, Allan H <allanh1...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >> > > do I need to pre order your Pat? if that will help,,?? I am not a great
> >> > > traveler,, I create problems for my self but need to know things like
> >> > > housing cost and then things like transportation to and from airports and
> >> > > which air port... when it comes to traveling I really don't do much now
> >> > > you know why.
> >> > > Alla n
>
> >> > Completely understandable! At the moment, ordering isn't possible as
> >> > we have still yet to confirm the retail price. Nonetheless, the
> >> > website ishttp://newlimepublishing.com/. You'll be able to see the
> >> > 'place' where the book will be, but, as yet, all that's there is the
> >> > placeholder. Still, it's nice to see my name in lights, kinda,
> >> > already.
> >> > On another note, I've just sealed a deal to appear on Swindon 105.5
> >> > radio on Monday, 19th Dec., 2011 at 10:00pm on Paul Devlin's show
> >> > 'Outer Limits'. It's a show about the paranormal and, as my theory
> >> > can put some science behind the concept of eternal consciousness, it's
> >> > on-topic enough for Paul to be kind enough to have me on-air. It will
> >> > be a 'Live' show, so, if anyone can tune in, please do. I DO believe
> >> > that the show will be available to download from their website a few
> >> > hours after it has aired, although I'm not positive of that. I'll
> >> > check back with Paul and find out for sure and let you ALL know. Next
> >> > trick is to coerce the BBC to put me on air. Wish me luck!! ;-)
>
> >> > > On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 5:29 PM, Pat <PatrickDHarring...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> >> > > > On Oct 27, 3:25 pm, Allan H <allanh1...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> > > > > I normally.. buy my books though the ""Book Depository" in England,, I
> >> > > > like
> >> > > > > their world wide free shipping.. either that I send you the money you
> >> > > > > sign it then send it to me..
>
> >> > > > Once we've printed a few, I can do that. We're still on target for a
> >> > > > release date on 21-Dec-2011, but I doubt it will be sooner. Also--and
> >> > > > this is, of course, for everyone--my publisher and I are thinking
> >> > > > about whether or not to plan a 'launch' for the book. That is, a
> >> > > > public party to celebrate the publication. The 'hitch', though, is
> >> > > > that, before we plan it, we need to have enough people to make it
> >> > > > worthwhile. You are ALL, of course, invited and it would be held,
> >> > > > most likely, in Stratford-upon-Avon. I don't have a date, yet, for
> >> > > > it; but, if, as I said, we have enough of a response to interest in
> >> > > > attending, we'll plan it. And, I suspect we would try to plan it for
> >> > > > a date when MOST people could attend. Please, let me know what you
> >> > > > (all) think!!
>
> >> > > > > It is true it repeats itself regularly.. CERN is not looking for a red
> >> > > > > face..
>
> >> > > > But are they looking around dimensional corners? I suspect not. This
> >> > > > 'revelation', of course, doesn't completely throw out the old
> >> > > > textbooks like so many think. It has NO bearing on Einstein's energy
> >> > > > equation, E=MC^2, for example. It only means that C is NOT the speed
> >> > > > limit we thought is was and, of course, it implies that tachyons are,
> >> > > > most likely, well...more likely. The existence of tachyons is
> >> > > > predicted by the original 26-dimensional String Theory and THAT is the
> >> > > > basis for MY work, so, I'm not at all displeased with evidence that
> >> > > > points towards tachyon-like particles. If anything, it's another
> >> > > > feather in my cap. LOL!!
>
> >> > > > > I do not see them rushing to build a second CERN they are a little
> >> > > > beyond
> >> > > > > my pocket change at the moment (see me in 500 year then we will talk
> >> > > > about
> >> > > > > it)
>
> >> > > > In 500 years, there may well be a new universe and intelligent life
> >> > > > (allowing for a rapid evolution via a large Hubble Constant--you know,
> >> > > > a 6-day Creation!!) would still be fairly nascent regarding particle
> >> > > > physics. But, you might be the engineer behind the New
> >> > > > Stonehenge!! ;-)
>
> >> > > > > On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 4:23 PM, Pat <PatrickDHarring...@hotmail.com>
> >> > > > wrote:
>
> >> > > > > > On Oct 13, 7:21 pm, Allan H <allanh1...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> > > > > > > okay Pat to quote you: Scientists are a stubborn bunch and see that
> >> > > > which
> >> > > > > > > they WANT to see.
>
> >> > > > > > > That is true,, except it is strange that on random timed tests the
> >> > > > same
> >> > > > > > > event occurs and they are checking for neutrinos else where
> >> > > > looking to
> >> > > > > > > eliminate the random event .. what they are saying is "a particle is
> >> > > > > > > arriving before it should.".. that it,, but that is very
> >> > > > interesting..
>
> >> > > > > > > what it is time will tell
> >> > > > > > > Allan
>
> >> > > > > > Again, I agree. Time will tell and the experiment and potential
> >> > > > > > result were interesting. It just needs to be repeated regularly, now,
> >> > > > > > using different (but similar) equipment and between different
> >> > > > > > locations. It still could end up only implying that the neutrinos are
> >> > > > > > discovering ways to exploit extra-dimensional short-cuts rather than
> >> > > > > > actually moving faster-than-light.
>
> >> > > > > > BTW, everyone, I'm still on target for a 21-Dec-2011 release date for
> >> > > > > > my book; however, the publisher has, now, changed the name of the
> >> > > > > > publishing company and it will be published by 'New Lime Publishing'.
> >> > > > > > I'll get you (plural) the website as soon as it's up and running. I
> >> > > > > > promise that New Lime will get you your copies as quickly as Amazon
> >> > > > > > would; but, with a VERY key difference: when we see any of your names
> >> > > > > > on the order forms, you can rest assured that your copies will be
> >> > > > > > signed by the author (that's me!) with a unique message for each of
> >> > > > > > you!!!! Through Amazon, that kind of 'order scrutiny' would be
> >> > > > > > impossible.
>
> >> > > > > > > On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 5:11 PM, Pat <PatrickDHarring...@hotmail.com
>
> >> > > > > > wrote:
>
> >> > > > > > > > On Oct 7, 7:45 pm, Allan H <allanh1...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> > > > > > > > > I don't think they know for sure just what they know for sure
> >> > > > just
> >> > > > > > what
> >> > > > > > > > they
> >> > > > > > > > > are something is arriving before the speed of light sez it
> >> > > > should.
>
> >> > > > > > > > > I think that is cool
> >> > > > > > > > > Allan
>
> >> > > > > > > > I think it's interesting, but they still can't rule out the fact
> >> > > > that
> >> > > > > > > > the neutrinos that arrived 'early' MAY have not come from CERN.
> >> > > > Every
> >> > > > > > > > star emits neutrinos in all directions at any time and as it is
> >> > > > very
> >> > > > > > > > difficult to stop neutrinos, they pass through most
> >> > > > > > > > everything...including the Earth. The fact that Gran Sasso had
> >> > > > > > > > created an object that WOULD stop neutrinos guarantees that, at
> >> > > > some
> >> > > > > > > > point in time, it would do just that. They'll never be able to
> >> > > > rule
> >> > > > > > > > out the possibility that the 'early' neutrinos may have been
> >> > > > sourced
> >> > > > > > > > from some place other than CERN and that will always cause doubt.
> >> > > > If
> >> > > > > > > > the scientists don't accept that, then they are as idiotic as the
> >> > > > > > > > Church was when it demanded that the Sun revolve around the Earth.
> >> > > > > > > > Scientists are a stubborn bunch and see that which they WANT to
> >> > > > see.
> >> > > > > > > > If they discover that neutrinos can consistently arrive at their
> >> > > > > > > > destination faster than the speed of light, it may not upset
> >> > > > Special
> >> > > > > > > > Relativity at all, rather, it may provide evidence that the
>
> ...
>
> read more »- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
0 comments:
Post a Comment