> Pat I have my card in hand ready to pay the required funds .. I am
> having a few problems.. I can find it the release date but what I can not
> find the order form to pre order the book like I promised I would .. You
> need to talk to new lime so I can place my order
> Your friend
> Allan
>
The very first 'proof' copy was only returned to my publisher on
Monday. I don't think you CAN pre-order; you'll have to wait for the
release date of 21-Dec-2011. Sorry. It's not a big publishing firm,
however, it MAY be once my book does well.
I thought I'd let you all know that Bill Heine of BBC Oxford radio has
agreed to allow me to co-host his Sunday morning 'Current Affairs'
programme. The details of when still need to be worked out. Plus,
yesterday, I met a man who works for the United Nations and tomorrow
(Thursday, 8th, Dec.) we'll be meeting to discuss my proposal for
peace in the Middle East! I thought it would take AGES to crack the
political arena, but it just fell into my lap--simply by choosing to
speak to a fellow human being who, like myself, had taken shelter
under an awning in order to have a smoke. Learn from this, ALWAYS
take the opportunity to meet people, for you never know just how
important that can be!!
I'll let you all know how things go as I can.
Cheers,
Pat
>
>
> On Fri, Dec 2, 2011 at 3:06 PM, Pat <PatrickDHarring...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> > On Nov 18, 7:46 am, Allan H <allanh1...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > I think the light speed has been slowed down,, the netrinios must be
> > tire
> > > from traveling to fast?? let me know when it is available and I will
> > > purchase a copy
> > > Allan
>
> > Will do!!
>
> > As far as photons and light-speed go, well, if it is true (and it is!)
> > that space is expanding, then photon MUST accelerate through 5
> > dimensions in order to appear to move at a constant rate in 4-D space-
> > time. This is, naturally, covered in my book and forms the basis of
> > what I call 'Extra-Special Relativity'. ;-)
>
> > > On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 10:49 PM, Vam <atewari2...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > Good luck, Pat ! I'm sure you have it from all others on this list
> > > > who've known you.
>
> > > > Whether you're held up, are sauntering or are hurtling through your
> > > > future... keep us posted.
>
> > > > On Nov 17, 8:22 pm, Pat <PatrickDHarring...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > On Nov 3, 10:00 pm, Allan H <allanh1...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > > do I need to pre order your Pat? if that will help,,?? I am
> > not a
> > > > great
> > > > > > traveler,, I create problems for my self but need to know things
> > > > like
> > > > > > housing cost and then things like transportation to and from
> > airports
> > > > and
> > > > > > which air port... when it comes to traveling I really don't do
> > much
> > > > now
> > > > > > you know why.
> > > > > > Alla n
>
> > > > > Completely understandable! At the moment, ordering isn't possible as
> > > > > we have still yet to confirm the retail price. Nonetheless, the
> > > > > website ishttp://newlimepublishing.com/. You'll be able to see the
> > > > > 'place' where the book will be, but, as yet, all that's there is the
> > > > > placeholder. Still, it's nice to see my name in lights, kinda,
> > > > > already.
> > > > > On another note, I've just sealed a deal to appear on Swindon 105.5
> > > > > radio on Monday, 19th Dec., 2011 at 10:00pm on Paul Devlin's show
> > > > > 'Outer Limits'. It's a show about the paranormal and, as my theory
> > > > > can put some science behind the concept of eternal consciousness,
> > it's
> > > > > on-topic enough for Paul to be kind enough to have me on-air. It
> > will
> > > > > be a 'Live' show, so, if anyone can tune in, please do. I DO believe
> > > > > that the show will be available to download from their website a few
> > > > > hours after it has aired, although I'm not positive of that. I'll
> > > > > check back with Paul and find out for sure and let you ALL know.
> > Next
> > > > > trick is to coerce the BBC to put me on air. Wish me luck!! ;-)
>
> > > > > > On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 5:29 PM, Pat <
> > PatrickDHarring...@hotmail.com>
> > > > wrote:
>
> > > > > > > On Oct 27, 3:25 pm, Allan H <allanh1...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > I normally.. buy my books though the ""Book Depository" in
> > > > England,, I
> > > > > > > like
> > > > > > > > their world wide free shipping.. either that I send you the
> > money
> > > > you
> > > > > > > > sign it then send it to me..
>
> > > > > > > Once we've printed a few, I can do that. We're still on target
> > for a
> > > > > > > release date on 21-Dec-2011, but I doubt it will be sooner.
> > > > Also--and
> > > > > > > this is, of course, for everyone--my publisher and I are thinking
> > > > > > > about whether or not to plan a 'launch' for the book. That is, a
> > > > > > > public party to celebrate the publication. The 'hitch', though,
> > is
> > > > > > > that, before we plan it, we need to have enough people to make it
> > > > > > > worthwhile. You are ALL, of course, invited and it would be
> > held,
> > > > > > > most likely, in Stratford-upon-Avon. I don't have a date, yet,
> > for
> > > > > > > it; but, if, as I said, we have enough of a response to interest
> > in
> > > > > > > attending, we'll plan it. And, I suspect we would try to plan
> > it for
> > > > > > > a date when MOST people could attend. Please, let me know what
> > you
> > > > > > > (all) think!!
>
> > > > > > > > It is true it repeats itself regularly.. CERN is not looking
> > for
> > > > a red
> > > > > > > > face..
>
> > > > > > > But are they looking around dimensional corners? I suspect not.
> > > > This
> > > > > > > 'revelation', of course, doesn't completely throw out the old
> > > > > > > textbooks like so many think. It has NO bearing on Einstein's
> > energy
> > > > > > > equation, E=MC^2, for example. It only means that C is NOT the
> > speed
> > > > > > > limit we thought is was and, of course, it implies that tachyons
> > are,
> > > > > > > most likely, well...more likely. The existence of tachyons is
> > > > > > > predicted by the original 26-dimensional String Theory and THAT
> > is
> > > > the
> > > > > > > basis for MY work, so, I'm not at all displeased with evidence
> > that
> > > > > > > points towards tachyon-like particles. If anything, it's another
> > > > > > > feather in my cap. LOL!!
>
> > > > > > > > I do not see them rushing to build a second CERN they are a
> > little
> > > > > > > beyond
> > > > > > > > my pocket change at the moment (see me in 500 year then we will
> > > > talk
> > > > > > > about
> > > > > > > > it)
>
> > > > > > > In 500 years, there may well be a new universe and intelligent
> > life
> > > > > > > (allowing for a rapid evolution via a large Hubble Constant--you
> > > > know,
> > > > > > > a 6-day Creation!!) would still be fairly nascent regarding
> > particle
> > > > > > > physics. But, you might be the engineer behind the New
> > > > > > > Stonehenge!! ;-)
>
> > > > > > > > On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 4:23 PM, Pat <
> > > > PatrickDHarring...@hotmail.com>
> > > > > > > wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > > On Oct 13, 7:21 pm, Allan H <allanh1...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > okay Pat to quote you: Scientists are a stubborn bunch and
> > see
> > > > that
> > > > > > > which
> > > > > > > > > > they WANT to see.
>
> > > > > > > > > > That is true,, except it is strange that on random timed
> > > > tests the
> > > > > > > same
> > > > > > > > > > event occurs and they are checking for neutrinos else
> > where
> > > > > > > looking to
> > > > > > > > > > eliminate the random event .. what they are saying is "a
> > > > particle is
> > > > > > > > > > arriving before it should.".. that it,, but that is very
> > > > > > > interesting..
>
> > > > > > > > > > what it is time will tell
> > > > > > > > > > Allan
>
> > > > > > > > > Again, I agree. Time will tell and the experiment and
> > potential
> > > > > > > > > result were interesting. It just needs to be repeated
> > > > regularly, now,
> > > > > > > > > using different (but similar) equipment and between different
> > > > > > > > > locations. It still could end up only implying that the
> > > > neutrinos are
> > > > > > > > > discovering ways to exploit extra-dimensional short-cuts
> > rather
> > > > than
> > > > > > > > > actually moving faster-than-light.
>
> > > > > > > > > BTW, everyone, I'm still on target for a 21-Dec-2011 release
> > > > date for
> > > > > > > > > my book; however, the publisher has, now, changed the name
> > of the
> > > > > > > > > publishing company and it will be published by 'New Lime
> > > > Publishing'.
> > > > > > > > > I'll get you (plural) the website as soon as it's up and
> > > > running. I
> > > > > > > > > promise that New Lime will get you your copies as quickly as
> > > > Amazon
> > > > > > > > > would; but, with a VERY key difference: when we see any of
> > your
> > > > names
> > > > > > > > > on the order forms, you can rest assured that your copies
> > will be
> > > > > > > > > signed by the author (that's me!) with a unique message for
> > each
> > > > of
> > > > > > > > > you!!!! Through Amazon, that kind of 'order scrutiny' would
> > be
> > > > > > > > > impossible.
>
> > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 5:11 PM, Pat <
> > > > PatrickDHarring...@hotmail.com
>
> > > > > > > > > wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > > > > On Oct 7, 7:45 pm, Allan H <allanh1...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > I don't think they know for sure just what they know
> > for
> > > > sure
> > > > > > > just
> > > > > > > > > what
> > > > > > > > > > > they
> > > > > > > > > > > > are something is arriving before the speed of light
> > sez it
> > > > > > > should.
>
> > > > > > > > > > > > I think that is cool
> > > > > > > > > > > > Allan
>
> > > > > > > > > > > I think it's interesting, but they still can't rule out
> > the
> > > > fact
> > > > > > > that
> > > > > > > > > > > the neutrinos that arrived 'early' MAY have not come from
> > > > CERN.
> > > > > > > Every
> > > > > > > > > > > star emits neutrinos in all directions at any time and
> > as it
> > > > is
> > > > > > > very
> > > > > > > > > > > difficult to stop neutrinos, they pass through most
> > > > > > > > > > > everything...including the Earth. The fact that Gran
> > Sasso
> > > > had
> > > > > > > > > > > created an object that WOULD stop neutrinos guarantees
> > that,
> > > > at
> > > > > > > some
> > > > > > > > > > > point in time, it would do just that. They'll never be
> > able
> > > > to
> > > > > > > rule
> > > > > > > > > > > out the possibility that the 'early' neutrinos may have
> > been
> > > > > > > sourced
> > > > > > > > > > > from some place other than CERN and that will always
> > cause
> > > > doubt.
> > > > > > > If
> > > > > > > > > > > the scientists don't accept that, then they are as
> > idiotic
> > > > as the
> > > > > > > > > > > Church was when it demanded that the Sun revolve around
> > the
> > > > Earth.
> > > > > > > > > > > Scientists are a stubborn bunch and see that which they
> > WANT
> > > > to
> > > > > > > see.
> > > > > > > > > > > If they discover that neutrinos can consistently arrive
> > at
> > > > their
> > > > > > > > > > > destination faster than the speed of light, it may not
> > upset
> > > > > > > Special
> > > > > > > > > > > Relativity at all, rather, it may provide evidence
>
> ...
>
> read more »- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
0 comments:
Post a Comment