My youngest son, like my good self suffers form anger issues. We have had a fine time in his 16 years dealing with this, teaching him to control this anger, urging him to learn when it is right and justfied to let it out, and when doing so brings only harm to him and those around him.
RP's stance would render all of this meaningless. That it is not his choice but Gods, when he looses control of his anger, indeed that such an expression as 'Control of his anger' becomes meaningless, there is no control.
I don't like this stance, and I certianly do not agree with it. There are many reasons, but perhaps the biggest is merely differances in inturpretating this message. God asks that you give up your head, that you surrender your will to the will of the One instead. God asks and then if you are so inclinede you do as asked, but you certianly have the freedom of choice in this matter, ss in every other matter.
It is easy to say, I have no will but the will of the One moves through me. It is a cop out though isn't it? It declares that 'I' have no choice, that the things I do I have not done. Can you imagine a World where such thinking was parramount?
Ohhh nooo, I do not like this line of reasonig it does not conform to the idea of a loving God and it makes us all guiltless of the worst of human behaviour.
On Sunday, 8 July 2012 16:57:23 UTC+1, RP Singh wrote:
The ' I ' is a projection of the mind , which is matter. Matter is under the control of various laws and can never be free. Many of the constraints to our 'will' are visible and accepted by all. It takes a deep understanding to the know the bondage behind the obviously ' free will ' .It is so easy to accept the obvious , but to know the subtle ties that bind us is true understanding.
0 comments:
Post a Comment