[Mind's Eye] Re: WELCOME (and request for suggestions as to what to put here)

I don't know much more than how to get a message to stay on top so
far. I like what Gabby says.

On Oct 1, 6:00 pm, "pol.science kid" <r.freeb...@gmail.com> wrote:
> i havent had time to come and look for a month now i guess.... are we
> reinventing ourselves?.... Is this a new ME..... as long as its ME.....
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Sat, Oct 1, 2011 at 7:16 PM, gabbydott <gabbyd...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > A warm welcome is what I'd like to feel at the beginning. I would like to
> > see this expressed in words of appreciation that I found it to the group and
> > that I should look around to see if I'd like to stay and contribute to the
> > group. I would like to see this expressed in an image that welcomes the
> > colourfulness and diversity of each group member to the other. I would like
> > to see my name and the group's name used in its openness towards individual
> > interpretations - in its singular as well as its plural meaning, in its
> > visibility as well as in its audibility. I would like to be informed about
> > basic rules of interaction in a culture neutral, unbiased tone. I would
> > behave accordingly.
>
> > I do not wish to get reinfected with horror vacui suppression.
>
> > On Sat, Oct 1, 2011 at 2:49 PM, Molly <mollyb...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >> I've reposted the Guidelines (Orn sent them to me.)  Let's put the
> >> little push pin to it and make it a top discussion (how is that
> >> done?)  Until we come up with new ones, having the ones we all know is
> >> better than nothing.
>
> >> On Sep 30, 11:54 pm, archytas <nwte...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> > I've taken down the two fixed messages at the head of discussions.
> >> > They had lost relevance and the link wasn't working.  We should really
> >> > discuss what we want here as a group, so I'll invite suggestions
> >> > here.  I never got used to new google groups myself, but I guess we
> >> > should think on that as well.
>
> >> > 1.I take it no one wants spam other than as a capital banning offence.
> >> > 2. I'm much less concerned than rude words than most, but even I don't
> >> > want to see them in personal attack or in torrents (boring).
> >> > 3. Rules work best when they are tolerant.  Manners often aren't.
>
> >> > So what would we want to see at the top of discussions?    I hope we
> >> > don't have to make a big deal out of it, but let's see.
>
> --
> EverComing