Re: [Mind's Eye] Re: Taxes

no rigsy , no one is talking about poor and lazy except greedy people who are afraid to bear their civic responsibility. The reality of what you have said is nothing more that a scare tactic.  

the real problem comes down to people who make these statement will have a serious problem when they find that God is a very real being  and his name is not wealth. the reality of it is you are responsible for your own actions..

one of the effects of the rich paying there share of taxes is the national deficit will go down..  rigsy my wife and I pay 54% of our income in taxes..  nice huh.. tax fairness simply sez the more money you make the more taxes you should pay.. a person making under $10,000 should have to pay no taxes  people making over $250,000. should be paying a minimum 35%  and those making in excess of $1,000,000. should be paying a minimum of 50%.  

No one likes taxes including me  but they are a needed. I would rather see my tax money go help out the poor and lazy rather than fund a massive war machine..

Allan

On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 3:46 PM, rigsy03 <rigsy03@gmail.com> wrote: 

Roosevelt came from wealth- so did his wife.

Why do the poor/lazy get to live off the wealthy?

Taxes should have some limit- rather than milking one over and over.
Tie it to purchases.

Money does start companies and jobs though I think some salaries are
out of line at the top- it needs a fairer basis.

Yes- people should be able to keep what they earn or inherit.

Yes- I am sensitive. :-)

On Aug 3, 2:43 am, allan deheretic <dehere...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Rigsy,,  boy are you a sensitive extreme conservative republican
>  as president Rosevelt put it.. a conservative a person with two perfectly
> good legs and refuses to walk...
>
> all wealthy people have no right to live off the poor...  they all
> regardless of political view or party need to pay their share of taxes!
>
> don't tell me that they create job because they don't.
>
> as for people sending money to relatives..  you put a maximum that can be
> sent tax free.  say 5000 dollars.
> Allan
>
>
>
>
>

> On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 4:09 PM, rigsy03 <rigs...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Who would invest under your system?
>
> > What about the government reducing its expenditures by 35%?
>
> > Nothing's to stop wealthy Liberals/Democrats from sending their excess
> > wealth to their government(s)-federal, state, local. Why don't
> > they? :-)
>
> > Immigrants send money to their relatives also. I thought the world was
> > flat, at last!
>
> > Why would people turn their labor/income over to a bloated/
> > spendthrift/  incompetant government like robots/slaves?
>
> > On Aug 2, 2:31 am, allan deheretic <dehere...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Being american,,  I think taxes are necessary but taxes need to be
> > dependent
> > > income..  the greater the income the greater the taxes.. and removal of
> > all
> > > tax exemptions especially on capital gains.....
>
> > > I am beginning to think that a petition needs to be circulated placing
> > > a mandatory 35% on income over $250,000.oo with no exemptions.
>
> > > That would go a long way to helping the relive the national debt..
>
> > > I also think all nation should have a 35% tax on money leaving a nation..
> > > Allan
>
> > > --
> > >  (
> > >   )
> > > I_D Allan
>
> > > If you can bear to hear the truth you've spoken
> > > Twisted by knaves to make a trap for fools,
>
> --
>  (
>   )
> I_D Allan
>
> If you can bear to hear the truth you've spoken

> Twisted by knaves to make a trap for fools,- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

--
 (   
  )   
I_D Allan

If you can bear to hear the truth you've spoken
Twisted by knaves to make a trap for fools,