I know I can get a little niave at times and perhpas spend too much
time in my head rather than the real world, but come on I would rather
be not working, have a robot doing my job so that I can spend my tiem
doing other things, getting better at playingteh guitaer, maybe
getting around to writing that novel, gardening, cooking, fishing! And
we could all do this as wages would not exist, nor jobs, as all would
be done and produced by our robotic work force.
On Aug 4, 1:41 pm, rigsy03 <rigs...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Yes- we will be able to rent drones-for -a-day. A new kind of escort
> service!
>
> On Aug 4, 7:16 am, Lee Douglas <leerevdoug...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > I don't e-bay myself Rigsy, I don't do credit and so have no cards.
>
> > As to the supper rich, what is the uses of keeping millions in the
> > bank? I mean you can't spend it all before you die, you can't take it
> > with you, so I guess you leave it to the kids, and then they still
> > wont be able to spend it all, nor their kids.
>
> > Money simply does not 'trickle down', those who have vast ammounts of
> > it do all they can to keep it, and I can see no logical reasons for
> > doing so. Share the wealth, yes indeed.
>
> > Materialism, yes I guess you are right, although I hope not. I think
> > whne the day comes when the whole world is fed and has a nice pile of
> > stuff it may cease to be so important. Once again I must declare
> > 'Robot Work Force' Yeah baby come on, I hope I see the day.
>
> > On Aug 4, 1:01 pm, rigsy03 <rigs...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > Have you checked out e-bay? Plus the super-rich have not changed their
> > > desires/shopping patterns as far as I can tell. It will be difficult/
> > > impossible to inhibit materialism as it springs from insecurity or
> > > hostility and is held as a positive value in a capitalist society. In
> > > a sense, we "barter" cash for goods and services.
>
> > > On Aug 3, 9:47 am, Lee Douglas <leerevdoug...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > Indeed I am, I don't think bartering is a viable option.
>
> > > > On Aug 3, 2:51 pm, rigsy03 <rigs...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > You are talking about the super-rich. Money attracts thieves and
> > > > > lawyers. Most want money to remain independent and "just enough" is
> > > > > just fine. We could barter.
>
> > > > > On Aug 3, 6:44 am, Lee Douglas <leerevdoug...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > > Meh! It's all the same ole same ole innit .
>
> > > > > > It's greed plain and simple, I think how much money does one perosn
> > > > > > need to libe as they wish.
>
> > > > > > Why do the extreamly rich do all they can to keep their money, I mean
> > > > > > what are they going to do with it?
>
> > > > > > Ultimatly we must find a better way, a replacement for material
> > > > > > wealth, and get rid of the whole concept of money. How though ummmm?
>
> > > > > > On Aug 3, 8:43 am, allan deheretic <dehere...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > Rigsy,, boy are you a sensitive extreme conservative republican
> > > > > > > as president Rosevelt put it.. a conservative a person with two perfectly
> > > > > > > good legs and refuses to walk...
>
> > > > > > > all wealthy people have no right to live off the poor... they all
> > > > > > > regardless of political view or party need to pay their share of taxes!
>
> > > > > > > don't tell me that they create job because they don't.
>
> > > > > > > as for people sending money to relatives.. you put a maximum that can be
> > > > > > > sent tax free. say 5000 dollars.
> > > > > > > Allan
>
> > > > > > > On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 4:09 PM, rigsy03 <rigs...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > Who would invest under your system?
>
> > > > > > > > What about the government reducing its expenditures by 35%?
>
> > > > > > > > Nothing's to stop wealthy Liberals/Democrats from sending their excess
> > > > > > > > wealth to their government(s)-federal, state, local. Why don't
> > > > > > > > they? :-)
>
> > > > > > > > Immigrants send money to their relatives also. I thought the world was
> > > > > > > > flat, at last!
>
> > > > > > > > Why would people turn their labor/income over to a bloated/
> > > > > > > > spendthrift/ incompetant government like robots/slaves?
>
> > > > > > > > On Aug 2, 2:31 am, allan deheretic <dehere...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > Being american,, I think taxes are necessary but taxes need to be
> > > > > > > > dependent
> > > > > > > > > income.. the greater the income the greater the taxes.. and removal of
> > > > > > > > all
> > > > > > > > > tax exemptions especially on capital gains.....
>
> > > > > > > > > I am beginning to think that a petition needs to be circulated placing
> > > > > > > > > a mandatory 35% on income over $250,000.oo with no exemptions.
>
> > > > > > > > > That would go a long way to helping the relive the national debt..
>
> > > > > > > > > I also think all nation should have a 35% tax on money leaving a nation..
> > > > > > > > > Allan
>
> > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > (
> > > > > > > > > )
> > > > > > > > > I_D Allan
>
> > > > > > > > > If you can bear to hear the truth you've spoken
> > > > > > > > > Twisted by knaves to make a trap for fools,
>
> > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > (
> > > > > > > )
> > > > > > > I_D Allan
>
> > > > > > > If you can bear to hear the truth you've spoken
> > > > > > > Twisted by knaves to make a trap for fools,- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
0 comments:
Post a Comment