choose to do anything you want at any given time. How is that not free
will?
On Aug 2, 12:51 pm, archytas <nwte...@gmail.com> wrote:
> "We have access to a technology that would have looked like sorcery in
> Descartes's day: the ability to peer inside someone's head and read
> their thoughts. Unfortunately, that doesn't take us any nearer to
> knowing whether they are sentient. "Even if you measure brainwaves,
> you can never know exactly what experience they represent," says
> psychologist Bruce Hood at the University of Bristol, UK. If
> anything, brain scanning has undermined Descartes's maxim. You, too,
> might be a zombie. "I happen to be one myself," says Stanford
> University philosopher Paul Skokowski. "And so, even if you don't
> realise it, are you." Skokowski's assertion is based on the belief,
> particularly common among neuroscientists who study brain scans, that
> we do not have free will. There is no ghost in the machine; our
> actions are driven by brain states that lie entirely beyond our
> control. "I think, therefore I am" might be an illusion.
> So, it may well be that you live in a computer simulation in which you
> are the only self-aware creature. I could well be a zombie and so
> could you. Have an interesting day." (from a recent New Scientist)
>
> We range over debates in free will and what it is to be human. So far
> we haven't established free will or even that we are not merely
> avatars in 'something else's game'.
>
> I wonder whether there are advantages in considering ourselves as
> creatures limited by programming and also capable of it?

0 comments:
Post a Comment