of thinking and behavior.//Yes- I think maturity is a relative term.
On Jul 15, 11:54 pm, ornamentalmind <ornsmindseyes...@yahoo.com>
wrote:
> Besides physical structure of brain and genetic issues, perhaps we
> should at least mention hormones when it comes to apparent gender
> differences. Flowing in the blood they are carried throughout the body
> and can greatly influence behavior.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blood-brain_barrier
>
> The subjective nature of the term 'mature' can lead us astray all too
> easily.
>
> On Jul 15, 3:32 pm, Tony Orlow <t...@lightlink.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > Hi Paradox -
>
> > I don't know which sex you think is more mature. I think each has
> > their own strengths, and different types of intelligence, and there
> > ARE structural brain differences. For instance, the corpus callosum,
> > the largest connection between the two hemispheres, is larger in
> > women, probably accounting for their more integrated thought
> > processes. It's easy for a man to ignore all else and obsess about
> > some question and its answer. It's hard for a woman to ignore reality
> > and become so focused on some abstract question. Men may be more able
> > to take decisive action, but if they don't pay attention to their
> > female's input, they are likely to wander into a well like Socrates
> > (or was that Aristotle?). Of course, these are gross generalizations,
> > and there is probably more variation within each sex than between the
> > two as a whole.
>
> > I have kind of a male mind. Could you tell? ;)
>
> > Peace,
>
> > Tony
>
> > On Jul 15, 2:41 pm, paradox <eadohe...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > I have quite some considerable experience of the emotional
> > > responsiveness of the fairer sex, rigsy :) Personally, i think the
> > > gender difference, if there is one, is more emotional maturity and
> > > honesty than anything "structural.
>
> > > On Jul 15, 12:04 pm, rigsy03 <rigs...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > Thank you, Tony and Paradox.
>
> > > > Except we can clean up our hard drive!
>
> > > > Maybe I should have said "reactions" rather than moods- esp. since
> > > > females have the rep of being moody creatures. I'm not sure if it is
> > > > memory or the sc that is triggered by irrational associations.
>
> > > > On Jul 15, 3:22 am, paradox <eadohe...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > Not as familiar with the terrain regarding imagination and creativity,
> > > > > rigsy; but some thoughts; imagination probably employs the same object
> > > > > representation and manipulation routines as event "simulation",
> > > > > certainly occupies the same higher order region; the process is just
> > > > > less well tethered; an analogy that comes to mind is that of the rider
> > > > > whose handling on the reins becomes more adept the more confident he/
> > > > > she becomes, and the more conditioned the horse gets over time.
>
> > > > > Creativity is more difficult to pin down; my intuitive sense is that
> > > > > it's probably defined in the versatility of transition of isomorphic
> > > > > brain "states"; so its not so much a "discrete" attribute, but more a
> > > > > "bell curve" function.
>
> > > > > Difficult to say about unexplained moods; could be the result of
> > > > > chemical or homeostatic imbalances, tensions, unresolved mental
> > > > > phenomena, or any of a long list of things really; what do you think?
>
> > > > > On Jul 14, 12:46 pm, rigsy03 <rigs...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > > Yes- that is too technical for me. :-) I see the sc as the hidden
> > > > > > currents of a river- at least this morning that's my view. Where do
> > > > > > you think imagination and creativity spring from? Or unexplainable
> > > > > > moods? Or the irrational? Don't be too technical, please.
>
> > > > > > On Jul 14, 3:36 am, paradox <eadohe...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > Interesting psychoanalytic approach; i'm sort of a little closer to
> > > > > > > the "technical" school; seems to me that dreams and phantasies are
> > > > > > > pretty much the same "stuff" as conscious thought, but without the
> > > > > > > coherence, constraints, and "echolocation" of input, cognition, and
> > > > > > > the autobiographical self; in that sense, we think (neural mapping)
> > > > > > > pretty much 24/7, conscious, subconscious, or otherwise; it's just so
> > > > > > > much more elegant when we're conscious, or daydreaming, curiously :).
>
> > > > > > > Re the "great conductor"; in this great cauldron of distributed
> > > > > > > mapping, something has to "direct" and prioritise attention; that's
> > > > > > > the job of dispositional affect (value), or emotion, through amygdala,
> > > > > > > hippocampus, and associated wide area networks. Antonio Damasio has
> > > > > > > produced some very interesting, very readable and easily accessible
> > > > > > > works in this area.
>
> > > > > > > On Jul 13, 1:51 pm, rigsy03 <rigs...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > The "great conductor" to where? The sc may color our thoughts and
> > > > > > > > actions but I have a problem giving it a thought process similar to
> > > > > > > > the ego or super-ego. The fact that we cannot control our sc makes us
> > > > > > > > want to control it- it can be dangerous or embarassing or distracting,
> > > > > > > > for instance. I do think it adds a dramatic complexity to our thoughts
> > > > > > > > and actions- esp. those "Freudian slips"! :-) Another possibilty is
> > > > > > > > that the sc is a warehouse for our unresolved selves that pitch and
> > > > > > > > twist in our minds during dreams or daydreams and sometimes influence
> > > > > > > > solutions by interrupting logic, problem solving, comprehension or
> > > > > > > > relationships. It may also serve the purpose of keeping us honest-
> > > > > > > > somehow the mind has to find a balance- "acting as if" only goes so
> > > > > > > > far.
>
> > > > > > > > On Jul 13, 5:13 am, paradox <eadohe...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > > Hi Mando, dont forget that our thoughts are also "merely things", and
> > > > > > > > > our sub-conscious also "thinks"; "emotion" is the great conductor.
>
> > > > > > > > > On Jul 12, 2:18 pm, Mando <richsu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > > > how are we easily swayed from our thought by merely things? is that
> > > > > > > > > > humans are focused or controlled by the sub-conscious...- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
0 comments:
Post a Comment