you about your comment to Pat.
So all is clear to all and since I couldn't tell for sure how you
meant it, were your words about Pat having his head examined directed
to his history of headaches?... were they merely a rhetorical device
saying he was off base with his views?.... were they said in jest? …
or was there some other meaning/intention behind them?
Thanks in advance for clearing this up.
OM
On Jun 2, 6:28 am, RP Singh <123...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Gabby , if I am not human will you tell me what I am ?
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 6:23 PM, gabbydott <gabbyd...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > What do understand about the nature of migraine attacks that you insinuate
> > a jesting sound to RP's words, Orn? Would it be somehow conceivable to you
> > that RP cares for Pat's health, because that's what humans do? I guess not.
>
> > On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 8:22 PM, ornamentalmind <ornsmindseyes...@yahoo.com>
> > wrote:
>
> >> "... Pat you need to have your head examined!" - RP
>
> >> RP, please be careful with such ad hominen attacks, even if said in
> >> jest.
>
> >> On Jun 1, 9:37 am, RP Singh <123...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> > What do you mean by true nature ? You mean that true nature is the
> >> > will of God and if nazis and terrorists are blowing up people it is
> >> > their true nature and thus the will of God. In short Hitler followed
> >> > his true nature and thus the will of God and Gandhi followed his false
> >> > nature and was just blowing in the wind. Pat you need to have your
> >> > head examined!
>
> >> > On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 10:00 PM, Pat <PatrickDHarring...@hotmail.com>
> >> > wrote:
>
> >> > > On May 31, 5:24 pm, RP Singh <123...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> > >> Whatever a man does he is bound to do as the Will of God is supreme,
> >> > >> but a person is not a robot. The " I " is an active agent and it is
> >> > >> the individual who taking control over his nature does good in this
> >> > >> world and on letting himself go does the bad. Strength of resolve is
> >> > >> inherent in every person , some use it a lot, others let their
> >> > >> impulses rule most of the time. It is in man's hand to keep his
> >> > >> nature
> >> > >> under control , and again in his hand to let it run amok.
>
> >> > > I agree with one exception. Actually, it's more of an inclusion. An
> >> > > individual must discover their nature before taking control of it.
> >> > > Then the rest follows...good or bad. For example, I fully believe
> >> > > that Charles Manson DID discover his true nature and STILL inflicted
> >> > > great injuries against humanity. The same for Hitler. Sometimes,
> >> > > knowing one's nature does not prevent one from doing evil but leads
> >> > > them to do it. In other words, if it is God's will that X be done and
> >> > > X is perceived by most people to be evil, X will still be done, as it
> >> > > is the will of God.

0 comments:
Post a Comment