Re: [Mind's Eye] Re: Given that it is almost impossible to be an individual

i have seen felt and heard beings from another dimention , i used to
be into some pritty gnarly shit , peice of advice dont call the devil
out to fight , a woman who was already dead / spirit defied her master
satin and came to earth from the ground to save me , knowing she would
be puneshed , i watched her as she trembeld pacing back and forth ,
pondering her decision , transparent in a dark golden glow , as she
walked through the trees , and eventually appeared behind me with her
hand on my sholder , i felt her breath as she wispered in my ear , and
filled me with reasurance and warning , she then walked across the
water , up the tree line , atop the clouds and paused to look at me in
thanks for her salvation and deep concern and yet .... with
reasurance that i'll never be alone , that theres a stranger from
another world who needs me , who i need ...... who keeps me alive so
many times , there must be a reason a POS like me is still breathing ,
but why ?! and now its time for the smart ass comments
calling me insain

Chuck Bowling wrote:
> To be honest, I really don't want to scan more. I'm not all that interested
> in gnosis. I have read enough to convince me that it is a spiritual or
> mystical perspective on the universe. While I don't reject the idea that
> there are things we don't understand I lean towards a less esoteric view of
> the world.
>
> If ya can't see, feel, touch, taste, or smell it then it ain't real.
>
>
> On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 8:28 AM, Ash <ashkashal@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Do a little more scanning, you should find gnosis and many other
> > 'spiritual' oriented paths veer far off course with theism in many ways.
> > Ontological reductions toward archetypal figures aren't necessary (gods),
> > interestingly I've found the newer pagan paths to be the most advanced and
> > flexible. In both, /you/ choose, they seem to be acquainted with the notion
> > of many schools, then there's life. Kinda like Taoism's syncretism in that
> > respect I guess. You could speak with any of these for hours and know they
> > are talking about the sciences but seeking hermetic constructions in all
> > angles, with no mention necessary of 'fantastic' stories. I think the term
> > is 'eclectic pagan'. That is, for /some/, of course..
> >