[Mind's Eye] Re: Guys? We need to talk.

This is true, but what you call a flaw I call a normal part of the
human pshyce.

We as a speices are far too disperate for everyone to agree with each
other, and rest assured when you talk about this flaw or that flaw you
are really talking about morality. How then do you judge your moral
stance as being supeior than others, by what objective measure?

Taking my example of racial bigotry further, I can understand why it
exist, even if I do not like it. It is part of the quiet human mode
of thought bassed around families, extented familes, tribes,
countries. Tell me would you say that patriotism is moraly correct or
incorrect?

As to if you belive this about Godthn you ust belive this about self.
You may find it absurd, but when you give it soem real deep thought,
perhaps you'll not find it so?

On Apr 28, 7:20 am, the taoist shaman <bryan...@gmail.com> wrote:
> lee , in order to have honesty / humilaty u must admit to hipacracy ,
> hypocrisy is part of humanity , not all flaws should be accepted _
> bigetry for example _  also these notions of if u believe ''this''
> about god the u must belive ''this'' about self is absurd ,       if
> we should accept all flaws then why do we have prison ,  if u see
> someones actions are harmful , to self or others , u should try to
> open there eyes to there destructive behavior ,
>
>
>
> Chris Jenkins wrote:
> > Well, so far it seems that Orn, DWB, Chuck, and Lee have all been suggested.
> > Any others, or your thoughts?
>
> > On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 7:33 PM, Don Johnson <daj...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > If there's a list of those willing I'd cast a vote. I thought of Francis
> > > first of course but sense he is unwilling, how about DarkwaterBlight?
>
> > > dj
>
> > > On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 10:56 PM, Chris Jenkins <
> > > digitalprecip...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > >> I don't think anyone would be surprised to hear that I've had little to no
> > >> time for all things Minds Eye. I did what I could to help grow the group,
> > >> and expand it into other venues, but honestly, I think it's time someone
> > >> else took over the top reins. I know that will be a contentious conversation
> > >> given some of the conversations and conflicts around here regarding
> > >> moderation, but I think it's fair to put the top level of control in the
> > >> hands of someone who is actually currently working to make the list better.
>
> > >> I don't know any better way to do it than to be democratic. I'll take
> > >> suggestions, via this thread or personal message, and the name I get the
> > >> most of will get the spot. I don't care if you want it or not...if the
> > >> majority of folks here find you to be fair minded, then they'll trust you to
> > >> hand it over to someone else. Who knows, perhaps there will come elections,
> > >> an official Minds Eye president or some such thing...ok, well, probably not,
> > >> but you get the idea.
>
> > >> This list has never been about hierarchies, but the fact is, someone at
> > >> some points in time has to make difficult decisions, with the good of the
> > >> group in mind. It's an utterly thankless job, and no matter what you choose,
> > >> there will always be folks who find you to be a fascist prick for making
> > >> that decision.
>
> > >> As an aside, for those of you who remember when DubiousProfundity.com was
> > >> the dedicated website for this list, you might be interested to know that
> > >> I've revived the new concept here:http://obnoxi.us. Feel free to
> > >> participate, if you like.
>
> > >> Enough with the formalities. I'll start. My vote's for Francis Hunt.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -