are released often when one feels what we call 'love', in neither case
is the symptom the thing itself.
On Apr 27, 1:21 am, Chuck Bowling <aardvarkstudio.chu...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Thoughts are the organized firing of groups of neurons in the brain and love
> is the release of chemicals in the brain that promote bonding between
> individuals. There is nothing mystical about either.
>
> On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 10:55 PM, ornamentalmind <ornsmindseyes...@yahoo.com
>
>
>
> > wrote:
> > Perhaps thoughts aren't real then...;-)... same for love etc.
>
> > On Apr 26, 12:47 pm, Chuck Bowling <aardvarkstudio.chu...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > > To be honest, I really don't want to scan more. I'm not all that
> > interested
> > > in gnosis. I have read enough to convince me that it is a spiritual or
> > > mystical perspective on the universe. While I don't reject the idea that
> > > there are things we don't understand I lean towards a less esoteric view
> > of
> > > the world.
>
> > > If ya can't see, feel, touch, taste, or smell it then it ain't real.
>
> > > On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 8:28 AM, Ash <ashkas...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > Do a little more scanning, you should find gnosis and many other
> > > > 'spiritual' oriented paths veer far off course with theism in many
> > ways.
> > > > Ontological reductions toward archetypal figures aren't necessary
> > (gods),
> > > > interestingly I've found the newer pagan paths to be the most advanced
> > and
> > > > flexible. In both, /you/ choose, they seem to be acquainted with the
> > notion
> > > > of many schools, then there's life. Kinda like Taoism's syncretism in
> > that
> > > > respect I guess. You could speak with any of these for hours and know
> > they
> > > > are talking about the sciences but seeking hermetic constructions in
> > all
> > > > angles, with no mention necessary of 'fantastic' stories. I think the
> > term
> > > > is 'eclectic pagan'. That is, for /some/, of course..- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
0 comments:
Post a Comment