Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Re: Mind's Eye Re: Pat

Maybe, in some ways, we must suffer madness to retain sanity?  From nearly 100 years ago.

Desiderata
Go placidly amid the noise and haste, and remember what peace there may be in silence.
As far as possible without surrender be on good terms with all persons.
Speak your truth quietly and clearly; and listen to others, even the dull and ignorant; they too have their story.
Avoid loud and aggressive persons, they are vexations to the spirit.
If you compare yourself with others, you may become vain and bitter;
for always there will be greater and lesser persons than yourself.

Enjoy your achievements as well as your plans.
Keep interested in your career, however humble; it is a real possession in the changing fortunes of time.
Exercise caution in your business affairs; for the world is full of trickery.
But let this not blind you to what virtue there is; many persons strive for high ideals;
and everywhere life is full of heroism.

Be yourself.
Especially, do not feign affection.
Neither be critical about love; for in the face of all aridity and disenchantment it is as perennial as the grass.

Take kindly the counsel of the years, gracefully surrendering the things of youth.
Nurture strength of spirit to shield you in sudden misfortune. But do not distress yourself with imaginings.
Many fears are born of fatigue and loneliness. Beyond a wholesome discipline, be gentle with yourself.

You are a child of the universe, no less than the trees and the stars;
you have a right to be here.
And whether or not it is clear to you, no doubt the universe is unfolding as it should.

Therefore be at peace with God, whatever you conceive Him to be,
and whatever your labors and aspirations, in the noisy confusion of life keep peace with your soul.
With all its sham, drudgery and broken dreams, it is still a beautiful world. Be careful. Strive to be happy.

© Max Ehrmann 1927

On Tuesday, 30 September 2014 20:03:14 UTC+1, archytas wrote:
I'm not sure what a real valid person isn't Allan.  I miss the entertainment.  The science was Kaliber Yawn, but then I'm a 'cold dark' man on physics and anti-traditionalist on god.  I hope you and I would not sit about pondering naked gymnastics for the young and virtue ethics like participants in The Republic, whilst telling slaves to fetch another glass of wine or herbal tea or a 'flute girl'.  We managed to ban Chazwin, a fine chap suffering from cancer at the time.  Manners and politesse can be very nasty.

On Tuesday, 30 September 2014 19:14:21 UTC+1, Allan Heretic wrote:
As  friend outside ME I enjoyed his private messages and liked him. He was a real valid person. Miss his input.

Allan
A Living Soul


-----Original Message-----
From: archytas <nwterry@gmail.com>
To: minds-eye@googlegroups.com
Sent: Tue, 30 Sep 2014 7:51 PM
Subject: Re: Mind's Eye Re: Pat

Just about my view Gabby, to be honest.  What would we be saying if we had known Paul Gauguin - see http://www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/art/8011066/Is-it-wrong-to-admire-Paul-Gauguins-art.html - not that I connect any such lifehistory with Pat.  

On Monday, 29 September 2014 22:15:16 UTC+1, Gabby wrote:
I agree with your analysis, RP. I share Pat's love for patterns and have experienced some of the side effects also. There are times and situations when this shown behaviour is normal. So these behavioural patterns don't really scare me. What got me really upset was the role of "publisher", a windy bubble creationist. The website was so crap, I understood I would not send one penny to this dubious enterprise and that they would not do anything to promote the book. I hope Pat has got more in sync with real people again.

Am Montag, 29. September 2014 02:47:55 UTC+2 schrieb RP Singh:
I have not diagnosed someone's character , rather I have presented my estimate about his behaviour pattern. It is not a judgement but an analysis of  abnormal behaviour.

On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 5:46 AM, Molly <moll...@gmail.com> wrote:
We are here to discuss ideas, RP, not the members characters.  Attack on a members character, even if your opinion is in the form of a diagnosis, is clearly outlawed in the guidelines.  Pat shared many interesting ideas in this group, and was appreciated by many of us.  Where I come from, we call an attack on someones character who is not present backstabbing, and is, by any measure, as Mando points out, a breach of trust.  Whether currently participating or not, we are not here to comment on people's character.  If you have any comments on string theory, or any other facet of Pat's book, I suggest you move on to discussing his ideas and away from diagnosing his or anyone else's character.


On Sunday, September 28, 2014 7:22:49 PM UTC-4, RP Singh wrote:
I have diagnosed an abnormal behaviour and do not attempt to make personality assessments of normal people.

On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 4:43 AM, Richard Blay <rich...@gmail.com> wrote:

So RP, Mr. psychologist, what are you going to write about Gabby if she goes out of communication based on her postings? ;)

On Sep 28, 2014 10:45 PM, "Molly" <moll...@gmail.com> wrote:
I reject your opinion and find it uninformed.

On Sunday, September 28, 2014 5:56:02 PM UTC-4, RP Singh wrote:
Pat was a classical case of paranoid schizophrenia as revealed through his posts. In mental disorders , unlike physiological problems it is not absolutely necessary that you personally talk to the affected person. His disease can be definitely gleaned from his thoughts if they are clear enough , which in Pats case were quite transparent. As for the sub-types of schizophrenia , paranoid schizophrenia is quite unique because it involves paranoid thinking as well. No disrespect is intended towards Pat , a disease is a disease whether it is physical or mental. Besides , for years I knew about Pat's ailment but never voiced it out of consideration for his feelings , but now that for years he has gone out of communication I thought there was no harm in sharing my thoughts with you.

On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 1:13 AM, Molly <moll...@gmail.com> wrote:
He was a very bright guy who offered is knowledge and ideas honestly, and, as you say Allan, without judgement and always with respect.  I will spare you my opinion of a psychologist who, without knowing someone personally and having never seen them professionally, would publicly declare a diagnosis of a person based on Internet group posts.  


On Sunday, September 28, 2014 3:37:17 PM UTC-4, Allan Heretic wrote:
I have a copy also, lol. Took me a while to get it even though I paid for it as soon as I found out it was being published. I have read it .  His book has given me a lot to think about.
Most of all Pat was  friend, and a legitimate contributing member of this group. He was here when I arrived accepting me as I am without judgment.

Which leaves you RP

Allan
Living Soul

-----Original Message-----
From: Molly <moll...@gmail.com>
To: mind...@googlegroups.com
Sent: Sun, 28 Sep 2014 9:09 PM
Subject: Re: Mind's Eye Re: Pat

I did buy a copy.  Whatever my opinion of the book, I would never deem it a failure. IMHO, that is up to the author, taking into account his own goals and objectives for the book and its first publication.  If #books sold is anyone's criterion, they will need to reference the facts. I know that Pat worked for several years on that book.  Publicly declaring it a failure seems, to me, extraordinarily harsh, especially if unsubstantiated.


On Sunday, September 28, 2014 1:57:52 PM UTC-4, Allan Heretic wrote:
Did you buy a copy? I did.

Allan
Living Soul

-----Original Message-----
From: RP Singh <123...@gmail.com>
To: Minds Eye <mind...@googlegroups.com>
Sent: Sun, 28 Sep 2014 7:10 PM
Subject: Re: Mind's Eye Re: Pat

Pat had very high expectations. He believed that his 'BOOK' would sell in millions and bring about a paradigm shift. The failure of his book might have been heartbreaking for him and he might just not be in the mood to communicate with us.

On Sun, Sep 28, 2014 at 9:21 PM, archytas <nwt...@gmail.com> wrote:
Sadly no idea.


On Sunday, 28 September 2014 02:33:28 UTC+1, Allan Heretic wrote:
I think of him too, tried contacting his publisher no response.

Allan
Living Soul

-----Original Message-----
From: Molly <moll...@gmail.com>
To: mind...@googlegroups.com
Sent: Sat, 27 Sep 2014 11:05 PM
Subject: Mind's Eye Re: Pat

I can't find him anywhere.  I also think of him from time to time.

On Saturday, September 27, 2014 4:45:33 PM UTC-4, Allan Heretic wrote:
Has anyone heard from him he has totally disappeared off radar..

Allan
Living Soul

--

---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups ""Minds Eye"" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to minds-eye+...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

--

---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups ""Minds Eye"" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to minds-eye+...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

--

---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups ""Minds Eye"" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to minds-eye+...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

--

---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups ""Minds Eye"" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to minds-eye+...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

--

---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups ""Minds Eye"" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to minds-eye+...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

--

---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups ""Minds Eye"" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to minds-eye+...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

--

---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups ""Minds Eye"" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to minds-eye+...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

--

---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups ""Minds Eye"" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to minds-eye+...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

--

---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups ""Minds Eye"" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to minds-eye+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

--

---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups ""Minds Eye"" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to minds-eye+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: Mind's Eye Re: "A wise man once said."

There remain questions on whether 'art' is so deep.  Men are inclined to tip waitresses wearing red more, red environments aid detailed work, blue more creative suggestions.  We respond better to 'pretty' people - men being able to combat this by taking certain kinds of anti-depressants.  In short, we are easily conned by the visual and presentational generally.  I would rather imagine Molly Brogan and Gabby Thiede as an off-beat cop duo than read Jane Eyre.  I'd have them doing 'An Inspector Calls' (Priestly) on the Rotherham street-bureaucrats and worthies who let down 1400 plus victims of child sexual exploitation.  Not quite English Lit 101 and the alleged 'realistic storytelling' of Bronte and how to get a man by inheritance and burning and blinding him.

Art is too often complicit with not showing us the detail of what goes on.  I wonder how one paints or sculpts the idea of a scene with a young kid who isn't going to be helped by a string of very expensive 'professionals'?


On Monday, 29 September 2014 17:43:47 UTC+1, archytas wrote:
The universe is beige Molly, colour virtual.  And that's the easy bit!  I was talking to some people about an 8 foot spider-ant queen that rules in the Andromeda galaxy last night.  She enslaves other species, causing them to turn on their own leadership via trance smells she emits.  This was fine as science fiction.  When I suggested there are such creatures here people were offended that I was treating them as stupid.  There are, of course, except they are small enough to crush under the boot.  Our biology is a true shock to many commonly held opinions and 'manners'.

I see the newsroom much as anyone else I know, and yet if I had Facil's skills would have to include something like the spider-ant queen and nausea to hint-explain my perception and maybe a wheelchair to simulate the exclusion of disability.  There were symbols in medieval art, like donkeys as either knowledge or stupidity.  The laying on of 'manners' is the kiss of the spider-ant queen.  The women and their cosy male f-buddies become progressively less attractive.  I watch through mirrors.of course, lest the Gorgon turn me to stone.  The scientist knows the image is not changing on screen.  In 'how does stimuli develop neural pathways' there are many questions, not least how the pretty women of newsrooms, the sweet little things of shiny happy news for shiny happy people disgust me so.  There is more to this than a million frames a second snapping to the neural world.

On Monday, 29 September 2014 12:13:44 UTC+1, Molly wrote:
More good questions from you Neil, very interesting. How does stimuli develop neural pathways. I've been reading research that suggests the heart emits electro-magnetic signals that effect the brain and stimulate re-routing of neural pathways. What we think we know is changing rapidly.

On Monday, September 29, 2014 1:43:58 AM UTC-4, archytas wrote:
Definite sensation of 'relativity flight' in the video Facil.  My partner sometimes has camera phases and produced some very alien images by shooting holes in the garden fence.  The odd student used to produce paintings of my stories on the farce of economics as 'mannered conversation masking horror'.

I have early morning news television on at the moment.  This is no doubt a collection of complex stimuli - the net result in me is revulsion.  Switching between apparent alternatives makes no difference.  There is a peculiar inversion of art as the lie that tells us the truth - this is the delivery of massive deception in order to lie.  I don't usually watch.  Too painful.  Others in the group might get comfort from the same programming.  As a scientist I'd focus on brain patterns rather than interpretations, suspecting people ain't watching news at all, but happy, shiny people for happy, shiny 'brain music'.  I have questions on how the same stimuli does such different things and how my internal picture of revulsion has developed.

On Monday, 29 September 2014 01:38:07 UTC+1, facilitator wrote:
Interesting sound (Music)   I did a sculpture not too long ago that is the physical representation of sound waves from a Thelonias Monk Piece of Jazz.
I will try to find it.

In the mean time:  (And now for something completely different)  Decided to film on my trip to NYC

--

---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups ""Minds Eye"" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to minds-eye+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.