Although we could look at physics that tells us our shadow is real and that when we walk away from it we enter a fifth dimension, there is little chance of us experiencing anything much different from this theorising are in the bugger all to slight range. I've attached a masters level thesis on the divine feminine. I don't actually like this work, though it is more welcome than most of the drivel students are forced into. It may seem odd that a scientist like me finds more pertinent in changing our ways of living for the better in an obvious fiction like the divine feminine and what I regard as a largely failed 'new paradigm' set of research methods.--
Molly currently has everything solid melting to air and the imagination central in creation and evolving processes. Of course, I'm not keen on solids 'meting to air' - it's piss poor chemistry and these days we think there may be hundreds of states of matter. I wonder what we can honestly say about alter universes. I find the literature generally weak like this thesis and wide open to easy criticism. How can we be imaginatively creative, perhaps even in Molly's strong sense of this, and remain honest?
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups ""Minds Eye"" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to firstname.lastname@example.org.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.